Re: [julia-users] Re: why do we have Base.isless(a, ::NAtype) but not Base.isless(a, ::Nullable)?

2016-10-14 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Le jeudi 13 octobre 2016 à 06:45 -0700, Florian Oswald a écrit : > I mean, do I have to cycle through the array and basically clean it > of #NULL before findign the maximium or is there another way? Currently you have two solutions: julia> using NullableArrays julia> x = NullableArray([1, 2, 3,

[julia-users] Re: why do we have Base.isless(a, ::NAtype) but not Base.isless(a, ::Nullable)?

2016-10-13 Thread Florian Oswald
ok i found the conversation here: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/julia-users/W6yyV4i_W_k/discussion On Thursday, 13 October 2016 15:45:23 UTC+2, Florian Oswald wrote: > > I mean, do I have to cycle through the array and basically clean it of > #NULL before findign the maximium or is there

[julia-users] Re: why do we have Base.isless(a, ::NAtype) but not Base.isless(a, ::Nullable)?

2016-10-13 Thread Florian Oswald
I mean, do I have to cycle through the array and basically clean it of #NULL before findign the maximium or is there another way? On Thursday, 13 October 2016 15:42:02 UTC+2, Florian Oswald wrote: > > i'm trying to understand why we don't have something similar in terms of > comparison for