Re: [julia-users] julia version 0.4.0-dev+1249 throwing an error on ArrayViews

2014-10-28 Thread Dahua Lin
Fixed. Please checkout latest version (v0.4.8), which works for both Julia 0.3 and 0.4. Dahua. On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 12:48:37 PM UTC+8, Dahua Lin wrote: I will try to fix this today or tomorrow. Overly occupied by grant proposal and setting up a new lab in the past month. Really

Re: [julia-users] julia version 0.4.0-dev+1249 throwing an error on ArrayViews

2014-10-27 Thread Dahua Lin
I will try to fix this today or tomorrow. Overly occupied by grant proposal and setting up a new lab in the past month. Really sorry about the package. Dahua On Friday, October 24, 2014 2:33:10 AM UTC+8, Tim Holy wrote: On Thursday, October 23, 2014 10:50:19 AM Douglas Bates wrote: What

[julia-users] julia version 0.4.0-dev+1249 throwing an error on ArrayViews

2014-10-23 Thread Douglas Bates
I think this is due to a recent change in 0.4.0. The declaration # use ContiguousView when contiguousness can be determined statically immutable ContiguousView{T,N,Arr:Array{T}} : ArrayView{T,N,N} arr::Arr offset::Int len::Int shp::NTuple{N,Int} end throws an ERROR: T not

Re: [julia-users] julia version 0.4.0-dev+1249 throwing an error on ArrayViews

2014-10-23 Thread Jameson Nash
The T parameter in the type signature of Array{T} below was recently changed from being silently ignored to not being parsed. I think Jeff may have merged this in his call_overload branch? On Thursday, October 23, 2014, Douglas Bates dmba...@gmail.com wrote: I think this is due to a recent

Re: [julia-users] julia version 0.4.0-dev+1249 throwing an error on ArrayViews

2014-10-23 Thread Tim Holy
On Thursday, October 23, 2014 10:50:19 AM Douglas Bates wrote: What is the state of Array Nirvana in 0.4? I am happy to avoid using ArrayViews if I can get contiguous views in 0.4 My personal plan is to fix #8504 and then merge #8501. Then look into incorporating contiguous views, reshape