Does that work for you? I have to write
A .= (*).(A,B)
On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 at 3:51:54 AM UTC+1, Chris Rackauckas wrote:
>
> It's the other way around. .* won't fuse because it's still an operator.
> .= will. It you want .* to fuse, you can instead do:
>
> A .= *.(A,B)
>
> since this
Hmm, that's surprising. Looks like we're using generic broadcasting
machinery for that operation (check out what @which P.*P returns). Might be
good to add .* to this line:
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/blob/b7f1aa7554c71d3759702b9c2e14904ebdc94199/base/arraymath.jl#L69.
Want to make a pull
OK, good to know. I think putting the function in a package is overkill.
> On 2 Nov. 2016, at 6:35 pm, Chris Rackauckas wrote:
>
> Yes, this most likely won't help for GPU arrays because you likely don't want
> to be looping through elements serially: you want
Yes, this most likely won't help for GPU arrays because you likely don't
want to be looping through elements serially: you want to call a vectorized
GPU function which will do the computation in parallel on the GPU.
ArrayFire's mathematical operations are already overloaded to do this, but
I
Ah thanks!
Though I guess if I want the same code to work also on a GPU array then this
won't help?
Sent from my iPhone
> On 2 Nov. 2016, at 13:51, Chris Rackauckas wrote:
>
> It's the other way around. .* won't fuse because it's still an operator. .=
> will. It you want
It's the other way around. .* won't fuse because it's still an operator. .=
will. It you want .* to fuse, you can instead do:
A .= *.(A,B)
since this invokes the broadcast on *, instead of invoking .*. But that's
just a temporary thing.
On Tuesday, November 1, 2016 at 7:27:40 PM UTC-7, Tom
As I understand it, the .* will fuse, but the .= will not (until 0.6?), so
A will be rebound to a newly allocated array. If my understanding is wrong
I'd love to know. There have been many times in the last few days that I
would have used it...
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 10:06 PM, Sheehan Olver
Ah, good point. Though I guess that won't work til 0.6 since .* won't
auto-fuse yet?
Sent from my iPhone
> On 2 Nov. 2016, at 12:55, Chris Rackauckas wrote:
>
> This is pretty much obsolete by the . fusing changes:
>
> A .= A.*B
>
> should be an in-place update of A