uld likely be preferred.
Jack
On Tuesday, March 8, 2016 at 8:20:10 PM UTC-8, Jack Poulson wrote:
>
> There were several recent extensions to Elemental's SVD support, as
> detailed here:
> https://github.com/elemental/Elemental/issues/125
>
> In particular, FULL_SVD, THIN_SVD,
There were several recent extensions to Elemental's SVD support, as
detailed here:
https://github.com/elemental/Elemental/issues/125
In particular, FULL_SVD, THIN_SVD, COMPACT_SVD, and PRODUCT_SVD are now all
supported, where the latter should used if you do not need small triplets
as it uses
I believe that Tony is suggesting manually applying the sparse operator
rather than explicitly constructing it and then applying it. This is a
common (and significant) performance optimization when a sparse operator is
only used once or twice, as the construction of the sparse matrix is often
On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 7:55:23 PM UTC-5, Ivar Nesje wrote:
There is a SubArray implementation, sub(), but it has some performance
issues related to indexing that should be fixed before it becomes default
for slicing.
For small arrays I would guess that hardcoded multiplication is
On Sunday, March 9, 2014 3:08:53 PM UTC-4, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
Le dimanche 09 mars 2014 à 11:39 -0700, Jack Poulson a écrit :
On Tuesday, December 24, 2013 7:55:23 PM UTC-5, Ivar Nesje wrote:
There is a SubArray implementation, sub(), but it has some
performance
