[julia-users] Re: GSL hypergeometric

2016-05-29 Thread lapeyre . math122a
I'm not sure, but you may be able to use PyCall.jl and python mpmath. On Saturday, May 28, 2016 at 12:32:47 AM UTC+2, digxx wrote: > > I'm using GSL for hypergeometric functions but needed to increase the > precision to big() > unfortunately it is not supported so now my question is whether

Re: [julia-users] Re: GSL hypergeometric

2016-05-28 Thread digxx
Hey thats cool. Thank you very much! Since I have been only working with normal Julia numbers: Do you know a root finding algorithm which directly uses ACB or ARB numbers? (So in principle I dont need to convert back directly) Am Samstag, 28. Mai 2016 16:30:57 UTC+2 schrieb Fredrik Johansson: >

Re: [julia-users] Re: GSL hypergeometric

2016-05-28 Thread Fredrik Johansson
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:02 PM, digxx wrote: > maybe one more thing. How can I extract the number from this form [0.1234... > +- 12341e-12341] + i*0 to a normal number such that I can work with it in > later calculations You can do this: julia> Float64(real(hyp1f1(R(1),

Re: [julia-users] Re: GSL hypergeometric

2016-05-28 Thread Fredrik Johansson
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 3:48 PM, digxx wrote: > Well thx yes this works. But it is not the notation I found at: > http://fredrikj.net/arb/acb_hypgeom.html#convergent-series > > Also I presume R=AcbField(128) set the float to 128. Does it always consume > the 128 bit for

Re: [julia-users] Re: GSL hypergeometric

2016-05-28 Thread digxx
maybe one more thing. How can I extract the number from this form [0.1234... +- 12341e-12341] + i*0 to a normal number such that I can work with it in later calculations Am Samstag, 28. Mai 2016 15:48:46 UTC+2 schrieb digxx: > > Well thx yes this works. But it is not the notation I found at: >

Re: [julia-users] Re: GSL hypergeometric

2016-05-28 Thread digxx
Well thx yes this works. But it is not the notation I found at: http://fredrikj.net/arb/acb_hypgeom.html#convergent-series Also I presume R=AcbField(128) set the float to 128. Does it always consume the 128 bit for real and 128 for complex coz it always adds the complex part for example R(1)

Re: [julia-users] Re: GSL hypergeometric

2016-05-28 Thread Fredrik Johansson
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 1:42 PM, digxx wrote: > Hey again, > So I found the the arb documentation and was wondering if the syntax is the > same. > since for example acb_hypgeom_m(1.0,1.0,1.0) does not work. Must be doing > something wrong :-( > sry Could you clarify what

[julia-users] Re: GSL hypergeometric

2016-05-28 Thread digxx
HEy thx. in particular I'm using 1_F_1 and die first argument is about ~-500 Is there a documentation? I only found the fithub page with not further explanation about hypergeometric Am Samstag, 28. Mai 2016 13:56:28 UTC+2 schrieb Sheehan Olver: > > This might be helpful: > >

[julia-users] Re: GSL hypergeometric

2016-05-28 Thread digxx
Hey again, So I found the the arb documentation and was wondering if the syntax is the same. since for example acb_hypgeom_m(1.0,1.0,1.0) does not work. Must be doing something wrong :-( sry

[julia-users] Re: GSL hypergeometric

2016-05-28 Thread Fredrik Johansson
On Saturday, May 28, 2016 at 12:32:47 AM UTC+2, digxx wrote: > > I'm using GSL for hypergeometric functions but needed to increase the > precision to big() > unfortunately it is not supported so now my question is whether theres > another package for hypergeometric functions which does support