Re: [julia-users] FactCheck.jl bundled with Julia?

2016-10-14 Thread Yichao Yu 
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Júlio Hoffimann 
wrote:

> Ok, I am not switching to FactCheck then, didn't knew it is being
> deprecated in a sense.
>

You can switch to BaseTestNext if you need 0.4 compatibility.


>
> Thank you,
> -Júlio
>
> 2016-10-14 18:05 GMT-07:00 Yichao Yu :
>
>> On Oct 14, 2016 8:52 PM, "Júlio Hoffimann" 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Oh really? I'm not following it closely. Please let me know why that is
>> the case, I was planning to switch to FactCheck.
>>
>> Afaict the new test in base is a improved version of FactCheck.
>>
>> >
>> > -Júlio
>>
>
>

Re: [julia-users] FactCheck.jl bundled with Julia?

2016-10-14 Thread Júlio Hoffimann 
Ok, I am not switching to FactCheck then, didn't knew it is being
deprecated in a sense.

Thank you,
-Júlio

2016-10-14 18:05 GMT-07:00 Yichao Yu :

> On Oct 14, 2016 8:52 PM, "Júlio Hoffimann" 
> wrote:
> >
> > Oh really? I'm not following it closely. Please let me know why that is
> the case, I was planning to switch to FactCheck.
>
> Afaict the new test in base is a improved version of FactCheck.
>
> >
> > -Júlio
>

Re: [julia-users] FactCheck.jl bundled with Julia?

2016-10-14 Thread Yichao Yu 
On Oct 14, 2016 8:52 PM, "Júlio Hoffimann" 
wrote:
>
> Oh really? I'm not following it closely. Please let me know why that is
the case, I was planning to switch to FactCheck.

Afaict the new test in base is a improved version of FactCheck.

>
> -Júlio

Re: [julia-users] FactCheck.jl bundled with Julia?

2016-10-14 Thread Júlio Hoffimann 
Oh really? I'm not following it closely. Please let me know why that is the
case, I was planning to switch to FactCheck.

-Júlio

Re: [julia-users] FactCheck.jl bundled with Julia?

2016-10-14 Thread Tom Breloff 
Actually that's not true. AFAIK, people are switching back to the new
testing in Base, and FactCheck will be deprecated eventually. (Unless I got
the wrong memo?)

On Friday, October 14, 2016, Júlio Hoffimann 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> It seems that FactCheck.jl has become the defacto standard for writing
> tests in Julia packages. Wouldn't it be a good idea to have it bundled with
> Julia? Any reason to keep the current test framework?
>
> -Júlio
>