Re: [JPP-Devel] TaskFrame and WorkbenchContext source code files for review before commit.

2008-07-04 Thread Stefan Steiniger
Landon, before you commit such changes I would like to a) review it (sorry, I have not found the time yet to read all your emails on that subject), which may need some time. b) get an agreement by other programmers [Larry, Paul, Andreas, Michael] that these changes are of benefit. c) know whic

Re: [JPP-Devel] Demo of OpenJUMP SBE 01.00.01 Available

2008-07-04 Thread Stefan Steiniger
Hei, I am not sure if I like the idea that you call your distribution OpenJUMP SBE since it is not a community "product" that we (as JPP) released. It can be any xxxJUMP but not OpenJUMP. So I suggest a larger name change. cheers, Stefan btw: I thought SB is not for "Small Business" but for "

[JPP-Devel] TaskFrame and WorkbenchContext source code files for review before commit.

2008-07-04 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
I've attached the two (2) source code files with some of my recent clean-up/changes. (This doesn't include any of the docking window framework or look-and-feel changes.) Please review my changes to these two (2) classes if you have concerns before I commit to the core. I'll commit next week if the

[JPP-Devel] Demo of OpenJUMP SBE 01.00.01 Available

2008-07-04 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
se the extra tab and then try to add another one you'll get a null pointer exception. I'm working on this problem. You can download the first version of OpenJUMP Small Business Edition (SBE) here: http://www.redefinedhorizons.com/shared_files/openjump-20080704.zip You can download the so

Re: [JPP-Devel] June OpenJUMP User Survey Results Released

2008-07-04 Thread Stefan Steiniger
ok.. let me note another problem [which includes the nice kml proposal as well]: We don't have a implementation of projections. So everything that relies on that is not doable before we get this implemented Stefan PS: @Larry, did you also implement KML write or only read for SkyJUMP? Paul Aus

Re: [JPP-Devel] June OpenJUMP User Survey Results Released

2008-07-04 Thread Paul Austin
The problem with the following proposal is not a technical one, it is a legal one. Google and the other providers typically only allow access to their tile layer using their web sites and web APIs. This is in part because they license the data from other parties for a specific purpose. Paul > I

Re: [JPP-Devel] June OpenJUMP User Survey Results Released

2008-07-04 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
Yes Nacho. I will need to talk to Stefan about making more regular releases. Once every 6 months is likely a doable goal. Something that was mentioned previously on the list was making a release whenever we meet a certain criteria, like N number of bugs fixed or something like that. I think it is

Re: [JPP-Devel] June OpenJUMP User Survey Results Released

2008-07-04 Thread Nacho Uve
Interesting results... Maybe, It's a good idea make a new official release every 6 months (Ubuntu way) or another period of time. I like very much the feature proposal: "Use Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, Mapquest, Open Street Maps map layer as background layer" It will be a very very very good featur

Re: [JPP-Devel] R: The internal Task.TaskNameListener interface is notnecessary.

2008-07-04 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
Thanks for the reponses Paolo. I'm going back in to reexamine all of the TaskFrame code today. After some tinkering yesterday I realize it is best to proceed with a light hand. The Sunburned Surveyor On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 3:29 AM, P.Rizzi Ag.Mobilità Ambiente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I never

[JPP-Devel] Weekly SoC report.

2008-07-04 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
Leandro and Christopher, Can you guys send me two or three sentences explaining what you did on you project this week and what you will be working on next week. I'll then forward this to the OSGeo mailing list. (I don't need more than one short paragraph, if that.) Thanks, Landon --

[JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP User Survey Prize Winner

2008-07-04 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
We only had two names entered for the June OpenJUMP User Survey prize. So it was pretty easy to pick a winner. After a coin toss "Schmidt from Germany" was the user selected. If Schmidt is interested in claiming his prize to have me work on a bug or little plug-in, he can't get in touch with me at

[JPP-Devel] June OpenJUMP User Survey Results Released

2008-07-04 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
I've put together and released the user survey results. You can read a summary of the survey results on my OpenJUMP blog. The blog post also contains a link that you can use to download the text file with the results if you wish. http://openjump.blogspot.com/ The Sunburned Surveyor -

Re: [JPP-Devel] Request from OJ the Merge

2008-07-04 Thread Stefan Steiniger
Hei Peppe, I "registered" your proposal. But one thing is, that the edit menu is working on a different level than all the edit tools. However, we/I need to think about it. The select stuff could be moved to a select submenu as you proposed. [can you add all the stuff you propose again to the wi

Re: [JPP-Devel] [ANN]: WFSPlugin 1.1.0 released

2008-07-04 Thread Rahkonen Jukka
Hi, Unfortunately this release does not work at all with GeoServer 1.6 beta 3 that happened to be on my computer. GetCapabilites goes fine with both WFS 1.0.0 and 1.1.0. However getFeature ends with this message on OJ screen: [Fatal Error] loose.dtd:31:3: The declaration for the entity "HTML

[JPP-Devel] R: The internal Task.TaskNameListener interface is notnecessary.

2008-07-04 Thread P . Rizzi Ag . Mobilità Ambiente
I never looked at this code, but from you wrote here I, personally, would leave the interface in place. Even if now only the TaskFrame class implements the Task.TaskNameListener interface who can tell if in some near or distant future some other class would need to??? An interface specify a "beha

[JPP-Devel] [ANN]: WFSPlugin 1.1.0 released

2008-07-04 Thread Stephan Holl
Hello OpenJUMP-users, we are proud to release a new version of the WFSPlugin for OpenJUMP. Since some newly developed features (e.g. WFS-T fpr WFS 1.1.0) were 'hidden' in SVN for quite a while we consider the plugin to be stable with this new features. This release includes the following new fea

Re: [JPP-Devel] Request from OJ the Merge

2008-07-04 Thread Giuseppe Aruta
Well. OJ sometimes seems more Developer-oriented than User-oriented, as also me (who tried to write the help docs) can confuse :-(. I do a proposal for it: 1) group all "Select.." menus in "Edit" menu in one submenu called "Selection" 2) Move "Edit geometry" and "Edit attributes" groups to "Edit"