Re: [JPP-Devel] new bugs - getting ready for OJ 1.3 release - translators sought

2009-03-04 Thread julien perret
Hi, I was wondering if you considered switching to GPLv3 for the license of OJ 1.3? I ask because we made a small piece of code that allows to use GeOxygene features in OJ and to transform OJ features back to GeOxygene. This code makes it easy to create GeOxygene plugins for OJ, but our problem

[JPP-Devel] R: new bugs - getting ready for OJ 1.3 release - translators sought

2009-03-04 Thread Giuseppe Aruta
Hi Stefan I am starding today to work around Italian and Spanish files. Italian will be ready in a coupkle of hours. I don't know Spanish. The previous Spanish translation was done by Nacho Uve so, if still on line, I would like to know his opinion. Peppe --- Mer 4/3/09, Stefan Steiniger

Re: [JPP-Devel] new bugs - getting ready for OJ 1.3 release - translators sought

2009-03-04 Thread Giuseppe Aruta
Please, see this page for translating procedure: http://openjump.org/wiki/show/How+to+translate+in+a+new+language and http://openjump.org:8739/wiki/show/How+to+translate+OpenJUMP+into+another+language Some notes on the translation procedure: 1) use the latest Openjump Nightly Build. 2)

Re: [JPP-Devel] Launching OpenJUMP with an embedded JVM for OpenJUMP cd/dvd.

2009-03-04 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
Peppe, It would be great if you could send your documentation to me. Thanks for offering to help. SS On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Giuseppe Aruta giuseppe_ar...@yahoo.it wrote: Hi London, the chapter I wrote is only a part of all the process to create a portable GIS station (Pen Drive,

Re: [JPP-Devel] new bugs - getting ready for OJ 1.3 release - translators sought

2009-03-04 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
Stefan, I can try to help out with the two or three bugs you mentioned. (I think it will be unlikely that I can get the new GML reader for OJ I was thinking about done in time for the new release.) Let me look at the bugs in detail later this week, and I will let you know which one I pick for my

Re: [JPP-Devel] Question about our (the JPP) licensing authority.

2009-03-04 Thread edgar . soldin
True, or later versions of the GPL X.X is the backdoor for newer GPL licences with more up to date legal definitions and regulations in the old GPL. But ... once licensed eg. 3.0 , there is no way back anymore ... without asking all copyright holders (code contributors). This becomes

Re: [JPP-Devel] Question about our (the JPP) licensing authority.

2009-03-04 Thread Stefan Steiniger
Hei, @Ede: thanks for the comment: so the VividSolution note says: * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 * of the License, or (at your

Re: [JPP-Devel] Question about our (the JPP) licensing authority.

2009-03-04 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
I think Stefan is correct. We need a good reason to switch the license version. I also don't think the permission from just Vivid Solutions is sufficient. There have been a lot of other people contributing code to OJ. Our project doesn't require contributors to transfer copyright or the authority