[JPP-Devel] [openjump-gis/openjump] 013b41: Fix #23 about wms base url including parameters (a...

2021-05-25 Thread Michaël Michaud via Jump-pilot-devel
Branch: refs/heads/main Home: https://github.com/openjump-gis/openjump Commit: 013b4157688007462e090811fdf7bb80e84b https://github.com/openjump-gis/openjump/commit/013b4157688007462e090811fdf7bb80e84b Author: Michaël Michaud Date: 2021-05-25 (Tue, 25 May 2021)

[JPP-Devel] [openjump-gis/openjump] 013b41: Fix #23 about wms base url including parameters (a...

2021-05-25 Thread Michaël Michaud via Jump-pilot-devel
Branch: refs/heads/ticket_23_wms_url_parsing Home: https://github.com/openjump-gis/openjump Commit: 013b4157688007462e090811fdf7bb80e84b https://github.com/openjump-gis/openjump/commit/013b4157688007462e090811fdf7bb80e84b Author: Michaël Michaud Date: 2021-05-25 (Tue,

Re: [JPP-Devel] Regression in WMS with OJ 2

2021-05-25 Thread edgar . soldin
wrt. "what to include in the url w.r.t ?, &..." that's easy to parse and fix. i am talking merely about not filtering any url parameters in the base url. also, it's totally fine if the base url throws an error if the user made a mistake manually entering it! ..ede On 25.05.2021 14:01,

Re: [JPP-Devel] Regression in WMS with OJ 2

2021-05-25 Thread Michaud Michael
Yes right. I think we tried in the past to use additional parameters passed in the URL as query parameters rather than base url parameters but maybe I'm wrong.Anyway, now that I added a field for additional query parameters in the query panel, there is no reason to not use the url string of the

Re: [JPP-Devel] Regression in WMS with OJ 2

2021-05-25 Thread edgar . soldin
hey Jukka, Mike, as i recall initially a base was used as given and only the generated parameters (request etc.) were appended. did we run into issues that we limited the usage of url params in the base url? if not let's just suppose the users know's what they do and not over-engineer this.

Re: [JPP-Devel] Regression in WMS with OJ 2

2021-05-25 Thread Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
Hi Michaël. Most "vendor options" in WMS affect GetMap, GetFeatureInfo etc. requests. At service level, in addition to "map" with Mapservers, additional parameters are at least used for identifying users. Unfortunately there is no standard name for the parameter. I have seen "apikey",

[JPP-Devel] Snapshots changelog

2021-05-25 Thread edgar . soldin
just switched the changelog/readme.txt presented on the bottom of https://sourceforge.net/projects/jump-pilot/files/OpenJUMP2_snapshots/ to a generated one from the git log. in case you want to check what changed in a snapshot quickly you can read up in there :).. ede

Re: [JPP-Devel] Class missing from OJ2 snapshot

2021-05-25 Thread Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
Works well with r4900. -Jukka- -Alkuperäinen viesti- Lähettäjä: edgar.sol...@web.de Lähetetty: tiistai 25. toukokuuta 2021 12.30 Vastaanottaja: jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Aihe: Re: [JPP-Devel] Class missing from OJ2 snapshot hey Jukka, On 25.05.2021 10:32, Rahkonen Jukka

Re: [JPP-Devel] Class missing from OJ2 snapshot

2021-05-25 Thread edgar . soldin
hey Jukka, On 25.05.2021 10:32, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote: > Could not initialize class javax.imageio.ImageIO please use the latest snapshot r4900(1668fa2).. ede ___ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

[JPP-Devel] Class missing from OJ2 snapshot

2021-05-25 Thread Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
Hi, I tried to test the WMS fix that Michaël did, but the shapshot cannot show the map. When I add the WMS OJ gives this message: Could not initialize class javax.imageio.ImageIO -Jukka Rahkonen- ___ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list