w someone made advertisement for OJ?
keep up the good work!
On 4/1/16 04:25, Michaël Michaud wrote:
Hi,
Thanks, I'm not sure it worthwhile, but I prefer to take the following
graphic as an encouragement.
These figures are probably much distorted by automatic downloads, but
it is the
Hi,
Thanks, I'm not sure it worthwhile, but I prefer to take the following
graphic as an encouragement.
These figures are probably much distorted by automatic downloads, but it
is the first time we
exceeded 4000 downloads a month, and the same month, we nearly reached
5000 (stable
release
Yes! Landon is right! Thanks Michael for your job.
2016-03-30 23:00 GMT+02:00 Landon Blake :
> Thanks for your work cleaning the code Michael. I appreciate it.
>
> Landon
>
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Edgar Soldin wrote:
>
>> On
Thanks for your work cleaning the code Michael. I appreciate it.
Landon
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Edgar Soldin wrote:
> On 24.03.2016 13:55, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> > Thanks,
> > I also can undertake some changes with more confidence because I know I
> > can get
On 24.03.2016 13:55, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Thanks,
> I also can undertake some changes with more confidence because I know I
> can get excellent support on this list either in GIS area or in java
> programming area ;-)
noted :).. happy bunny days.. ede
Hi,
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was not frightened at all,
> maybe you should be ;)
Yes of course I can introduce new bugs. The risk is quite low with the
kind of changes I've done since 1.9.1, but I don't exclude to do deeper
changes.
Hopefully, we have a good and stable 1.9.1 release, and it seems a good
On 24.03.2016 11:38, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was not frightened at all,
maybe you should be ;)
>just curious and also glad. Cleaning old code that is not really broken is
>something that usually remains undone.
"never touch a running system"
>Another example is developer
as far as i have seen the changes were more of a formatting natures so far.
but, Jukka is right of course, touching existing working code is prone to
introduce errors.
that being said, i trust you'll be extra careful and try not to introduce new
code if not absolutely needed.
..ede
rOn
Hi Jukka,
Some benefits are :
- making the code more readable (with for each loop, generics,
autoboxing : formatting and using simpler syntax help to understand the
code more quickly)
- making the code more safe (using generics, try with resource)
- most of things I rewrite are suggestions
Hi,
Michaël seems to do much work with "Cleaning, formatting rewriting". As a
non-programmer I would like to know what and why, and what benefit OpenJUMP
will have from this code review.
Regards,
-Jukka Rahkonen-
--
10 matches
Mail list logo