Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ look and feel issue

I ran both OJ and SkyJUMP from the Eclipse IDE with identical settings. Larry On 9/13/07, Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what about the JDK version to "build" the jars? > > Oj is 1.5 - in case you use 1.6 > > stefan > > Larry Becker schrieb: > >> you mean it is different on both PC

Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ look and feel issue

what about the JDK version to "build" the jars? Oj is 1.5 - in case you use 1.6 stefan Larry Becker schrieb: >> you mean it is different on both PC's you have? > Yes. >> what about the java version? > Good idea, but not it. Both are running the same JRE. > > Larry > On 9/13/07, Stefan Steinige

Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ look and feel issue

> you mean it is different on both PC's you have? Yes. > what about the java version? Good idea, but not it. Both are running the same JRE. Larry On 9/13/07, Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > you mean it is different on both PC's you have? > > what about the java version? > > stefan >

Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ look and feel issue

you mean it is different on both PC's you have? what about the java version? stefan Larry Becker schrieb: > I tried this on my home PC and it looked the same as SkyJUMP. I went > though all of the Skins, but that wasn't it. Hmm. > > Larry > > On 9/12/07, Larry Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot

Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ look and feel issue

I tried this on my home PC and it looked the same as SkyJUMP. I went though all of the Skins, but that wasn't it. Hmm. Larry On 9/12/07, Larry Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just noticed that on my PC, OJ's UI looks different from SkyJUMP. > The menus in OJ seem to be rendered without fo