Doesn't seem excessive to me.
Larry
On 6/25/07, Sunburned Surveyor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Larry wrote: "IMO Javadoc comments should be short statements of
> > purpose. They shouldn't talk about algorithms, but should document
> > anything unusual about parameters. For example, Object para
Larry wrote: "IMO Javadoc comments should be short statements of
> purpose. They shouldn't talk about algorithms, but should document
> anything unusual about parameters. For example, Object parameters are
> used in RenderManager methods, but it isn't documented what Objects
> are acceptable."
E
Hi SS,
OK by me. IMO Javadoc comments should be short statements of
purpose. They shouldn't talk about algorithms, but should document
anything unusual about parameters. For example, Object parameters are
used in RenderManager methods, but it isn't documented what Objects
are acceptable.
reg
