Re: [JPP-Devel] Improvement to GeoTIFF reader

2013-08-26 Thread Rahkonen Jukka
Hi, I do not know for sure what happens here but I do not believe that it is possible to get a perfect match with pixels with that code. Here is an excerpt. Geometry fence = SelectionTools.getFenceGeometry(context); Envelope envWanted = fence.getEnvelopeInternal(); BufferedImage

Re: [JPP-Devel] Improvement to GeoTIFF reader

2013-08-26 Thread edgar . soldin
i see what i can do.. maybe together with a warning in the statusbar of the workbench.. ede On 25.08.2013 00:09, Rahkonen Jukka wrote: Hi, The Geotiff reader does now - examine if tiff image contains geotiff tags - if not, check if tfw file can be found - if not, send an error and quit.

Re: [JPP-Devel] Improvement to GeoTIFF reader

2013-08-26 Thread Rahkonen Jukka
Hi, I believe you can copy the GeoTIFF part and feed in the values manually if neither tags not tfw file is found. At the same time you can correct the comments about anchor point in GeoTIFF // These parameters are the same as those in a tfw file. = These parameters are the same as those in a

Re: [JPP-Devel] Improvement to GeoTIFF reader

2013-08-26 Thread edgar . soldin
sorry.. can you provide a diff? not sure what of the below is really a change and what not.. ede On 26.08.2013 12:16, Rahkonen Jukka wrote: Hi, I believe you can copy the GeoTIFF part and feed in the values manually if neither tags not tfw file is found. At the same time you can correct

Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ image support

2013-08-26 Thread edgar . soldin
you should probably add that as a featreq. on sf.net.. i looked but couldn't find where to fetch the GTRasterTypeGeoKey value. seems not to be entried in https://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/code/3684/tree/core/trunk/src/org/libtiff/jai/codec/XTIFF.java#l8 also i cannot find any of the other

Re: [JPP-Devel] Improvement to GeoTIFF reader

2013-08-26 Thread Rahkonen Jukka
I can try to describe Instead of comment // These parameters are the same as those in a tfw file. write something like = These parameters are the same as those in a tfw file but the anchor point is shifted by half a pixel Instead of comment // x-coordinate of the // center of the upper //

Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ image support

2013-08-26 Thread Rahkonen Jukka
Hi, I believe that doing things correctly with the normal PixelIsArea images will be enough for now. -Jukka- -Alkuperäinen viesti- Lähettäjä: edgar.sol...@web.de [mailto:edgar.sol...@web.de] Lähetetty: 26. elokuuta 2013 13:39 Vastaanottaja: OpenJump develop and use Aihe: Re:

Re: [JPP-Devel] Improvement to GeoTIFF reader

2013-08-26 Thread edgar . soldin
thanks.. much more understandable.. will see to update the sources accordingly. ..ede On 26.08.2013 12:50, Rahkonen Jukka wrote: I can try to describe Instead of comment // These parameters are the same as those in a tfw file. write something like = These parameters are the same as those

Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP SVN

2013-08-26 Thread Giuseppe Aruta
Thanks Stefan, I was able to reactivate Subversion and Subversive. The main problem was the absence of a driver :-( Peppe 2013/8/24 Stefan Steiniger sst...@geo.uzh.ch Hi Peppe, so does it work for you now? In case not: - I use subversive plugin for eclipse with the java-based driver:

Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP SVN

2013-08-26 Thread Giuseppe Aruta
How was the weather like at La Serena, Stefan? Did you go to Eiqui valley? A cousin of my wife was living there until last year Peppe 2013/8/26 Giuseppe Aruta giuseppe_ar...@yahoo.it Thanks Stefan, I was able to reactivate Subversion and Subversive. The main problem was the absence of a

Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP SVN

2013-08-26 Thread Stefan Steiniger
going to respond off-list - or are other interested as well ;) Am 26.08.13 10:50, schrieb Giuseppe Aruta: How was the weather like at La Serena, Stefan? Did you go to Eiqui valley? A cousin of my wife was living there until last year Peppe 2013/8/26 Giuseppe Aruta giuseppe_ar...@yahoo.it

Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP SVN

2013-08-26 Thread edgar . soldin
why not.. the NSA is listening in anyway ;).. ede On 26.08.2013 18:03, Stefan Steiniger wrote: going to respond off-list - or are other interested as well ;) Am 26.08.13 10:50, schrieb Giuseppe Aruta: How was the weather like at La Serena, Stefan? Did you go to Eiqui valley? A cousin of my

[JPP-Devel] Fwd: [jump-pilot:bugs] #330 Postgis fails to connect for 1.6.3 (rev. 3576)

2013-08-26 Thread Stefan Steiniger
Hi all, see the comment by a user below - to have a System-Info menu item directly under Help. We actually have something similar (HelpAbout...Info tab), but I somehow agree that we should add a separate menu item that shortcuts, or just creates an extra window without the other stuff.

[JPP-Devel] disable ip6 for postgis WAS: Re: [jump-pilot:bugs] #330 Postgis fails to connect for 1.6.3 (rev. 3576)

2013-08-26 Thread edgar . soldin
Michael, actually there must be a way to fix the code.. something is fishy here. i am sure we can at least enforce ip4 for the socket creation. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9882357/how-to-set-java-net-preferipv4stack-true-in-the-java-code seems to have a solution. 1. use

Re: [JPP-Devel] disable ip6 for postgis WAS: Re: [jump-pilot:bugs] #330 Postgis fails to connect for 1.6.3 (rev. 3576)

2013-08-26 Thread edgar . soldin
actually there should also be a way to enable IP6 additionally for the socket, dependig on what type of address is given by the user. but i don't know if you want to digg deep on this? ..ede On 26.08.2013 21:34, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: Michael, actually there must be a way to fix the

Re: [JPP-Devel] disable ip6 for postgis WAS: Re: [jump-pilot:bugs] #330 Postgis fails to connect for 1.6.3 (rev. 3576)

2013-08-26 Thread Michaël Michaud
Hi, Good catch Ede, Any reason to save and re-apply old values rather than to change the option for the whole jvm session with -D option in the batch file ? Also, do you thing it is worth testing java version to apply the change for java 7 + only ? Anyway, if the best fix is to change the

Re: [JPP-Devel] disable ip6 for postgis WAS: Re: [jump-pilot:bugs] #330 Postgis fails to connect for 1.6.3 (rev. 3576)

2013-08-26 Thread edgar . soldin
On 26.08.2013 23:02, Michaël Michaud wrote: Hi, Good catch Ede, Any reason to save and re-apply old values rather than to change the option for the whole jvm session with -D option in the batch file ? yeah, just because postgis cannot or we don't allow it to use IP6 does not mean that othe