Hi Peppe,
Some times ago, you have enhanced the tooltip on the LayerNamePanel.
It's very useful to get the sourcefile in this tooltip ;-)
I find the tooltip quite big though.
I think the layername is redundant with the one of layerNamePanel and
could be removed
And maybe the format and the
I agree with Michaël. The tooltip is a bit too big and the layer name is not
necessary.
Andrei
On Sunday, March 15, 2015 5:22 PM, Michaël Michaud
m.michael.mich...@orange.fr wrote:
Hi Peppe,
Some times ago, you have enhanced the tooltip on the LayerNamePanel.
It's very useful to
can one of you post a screenshot visualizing a problem? i'd say the layername
is important to circumvent any possible uncertainty for which layer the infos
are displayed. we have already 4 lines in it, so removing just one wouldn't be
a major size reducer.
i'd agree that the tooltip's width
Hi Peppe, ede
Here's a screenshot. I think you can drop the layer name as you can see it
anyway next to the tooltip :) And perhaps the tooltip box can be customized to
fit the information offered for each layer.
Cheers,Andrei
On Sunday, March 15, 2015 9:45 PM, Giuseppe Aruta
Hi,
I made a test file with one point and one attribute of each selectable data
type. However, OpenJUMP is not totally ready for handling all those.
Saving the JML file as shapefile stops to the following error:
java.lang.Exception: ShapefileWriter: unsupported AttributeType found in
Hi Michael, Andrei, Ede,
I put the tooltip to visualize all the possible information available,
expecially datasource and sourcefile.
WMS and WFS layers have even 5 lines (layer name, datasource, Url, CRS and
Envelope.
RasterImageLayer tooltip shows also the type of raster file on Datasource
line
I am sorry, Michael.
I am totally involved to the raster section of OpenJUMP. I will try to do
some tests on next days.
But, as I can see, Jukka is always the first and the most professional ;-)
Peppe
2015-03-15 18:26 GMT+01:00 Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
jukka.rahko...@maanmittauslaitos.fi:
Hi,
thanks. it nicely shows that the tooltip is _not_ aligned with layername in the
tree. in a project with many layers, similarly named you might have to look
again over which one your mouse actually hovers.
this second look is currently unnecessary. and again it's 4 lines now vs. 3
after.
my
Revision: 4340
http://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/code/4340
Author: michaudm
Date: 2015-03-15 22:10:27 + (Sun, 15 Mar 2015)
Log Message:
---
Add BigInt, Time and Numeric to jml and shapefile writer to be consistent with
all types available in the schema editor.
Hi Jukka,
Thank you for the test and sorry for the exceptions.
I just completed with BIGINT, TIME and NUMERIC.
Shapefile driver will not really handle all these types. I've just handled
long and boolean in a specific way. Other types are just mapped to old
types.
This is how new types are
Hi,
I would like to suggest to do some more planning. Now the same information, and
a bit more, that the tooltip shows
is also available also from right click, layer properties, but no for all type
of layers, for example WMS layers.
It might be good to improve the Layer properties view so
Revision: 4339
http://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/code/4339
Author: ma15569
Date: 2015-03-15 21:22:03 + (Sun, 15 Mar 2015)
Log Message:
---
Corret minor bug
Modified Paths:
--
12 matches
Mail list logo
