[JPP-Devel] Roadmatcher for OJ 1.10

Hi, I just upgraded RoadMatcher so that it is compatible with future OJ1.10 (need last NB of OJ) https://sourceforge.net/projects/jump-pilot/files/OpenJUMP_plugins/More%20Plugins/ Please, report any problem, Michaël

[JPP-Devel] SVN: [5251] plug-ins/RoadMatcher/trunk/src/com/vividsolutions/jcs

Revision: 5251 http://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/code/5251 Author: michaudm Date: 2016-12-06 22:38:06 + (Tue, 06 Dec 2016) Log Message: --- Upgrade RoadMatcher to be compatible with OpenJUMP 1.10 Modified Paths: --

[JPP-Devel] SVN: [5250] core/trunk/src/com/vividsolutions/jump/workbench/ui/ AttributeTablePanel.java

Revision: 5250 http://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/code/5250 Author: michaudm Date: 2016-12-06 22:36:10 + (Tue, 06 Dec 2016) Log Message: --- compatibility with RoadMatcher Modified Paths: --

Re: [JPP-Devel] Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Java codes in OpenJUMP which are not under GNU or any other public licence

Thanks to Ugo! This plug-in opens to an interesting future! Il 06/Dic/2016 20:38, "stefan steiniger" ha scritto: > nice! > and also that he is still reachable ;) > > On Dec 6, 2016, at 14:34, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: > > > > > for reference here's the answer from Ugo.. ede

Re: [JPP-Devel] Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Java codes in OpenJUMP which are not under GNU or any other public licence

nice! and also that he is still reachable ;) On Dec 6, 2016, at 14:34, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote: > > for reference here's the answer from Ugo.. ede > > Forwarded Message > Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: [JPP-Devel] Java codes in OpenJUMP which are not > under GNU or any other

[JPP-Devel] SVN: [5249] plug-ins/SextantePlugIn

Revision: 5249 http://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/code/5249 Author: ma15569 Date: 2016-12-06 17:40:59 + (Tue, 06 Dec 2016) Log Message: --- Updated Sextante binding Modified Paths: -- plug-ins/SextantePlugIn/.classpath

[JPP-Devel] Fwd: Re: Fwd: Re: Java codes in OpenJUMP which are not under GNU or any other public licence

for reference here's the answer from Ugo.. ede Forwarded Message Subject:Re: Fwd: Re: [JPP-Devel] Java codes in OpenJUMP which are not under GNU or any other public licence Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 18:38:36 +0100 From: Ugo Taddei To: Edgar Soldin

Re: [JPP-Devel] Sextante

Thank Ede, I will upgrade the source this evening Peppe 2016-12-06 18:30 GMT+01:00 : > as the sextante binding source is in svn, let me have a try at that > initialization. i think, i can simplify that somewhat and make sure it runs > wherever it is placed. > might take

Re: [JPP-Devel] Sextante

as the sextante binding source is in svn, let me have a try at that initialization. i think, i can simplify that somewhat and make sure it runs wherever it is placed. might take until the weekend though. ..ede On 06.12.2016 15:40, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: > Hi Ede, > can you check the new

Re: [JPP-Devel] Creating TIN with OpenJUMP

Formally valid WKT TIN (from PostGIS regress) - TIN ZM ( ((0 0 0 0, 0 0 1 0, 0 1 0 4, 0 0 0 0)), ((0 0 0 1, 0 1 0 2, 1 1 0 3, 0 1 0 1)) ) TIN EMPTY TIN ( ((0 0, 0 0, 0 1, 0 0)), ((0 0, 0 1, 1 1, 0

Re: [JPP-Devel] Creating TIN with OpenJUMP

Jukka: I did some work on a TIN plug-in for GeoTools a few years ago with a Summer of Code project. I know there is also TIN code as part of JTS. I don't think either of these got incorporated in to JUMP/OpenJUMP. Do you need the TIN WKT file format for a specific purpose? Landon On Fri, Dec

Re: [JPP-Devel] Sextante

Hi Ede, can you check the new version? (OJ 5248) a) added Logger.debug instead of System.out.println b) checked all Stefan's path and rewrite according to his sintax c) test on my local OJ setup to see if everything (old and new*) was working: access to algorithms, access to plugins, access to

[JPP-Devel] SVN: [5248] core/trunk/lib/plus

Revision: 5248 http://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/code/5248 Author: ma15569 Date: 2016-12-06 14:17:55 + (Tue, 06 Dec 2016) Log Message: --- Added Paths: --- core/trunk/lib/plus/ojsextante_binding_dic2016a.jar Removed Paths: -