Martin's solution worked wonderfully. I committed the change last night. A
check box was added for Regular Expressions that defaults to off.
Larry
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Larry Becker becker.la...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm. Escaping every character sounds like it might be workable. I'll
thank you both!
I would add the plugin to the default-plugins.xml file if you don't mind
stefan
Larry Becker schrieb:
Martin's solution worked wonderfully. I committed the change last
night. A check box was added for Regular Expressions that defaults to off.
Larry
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009
Yay!
Larry Becker wrote:
Martin's solution worked wonderfully. I committed the change last
night. A check box was added for Regular Expressions that defaults to
off.
Larry
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Larry Becker becker.la...@gmail.com
mailto:becker.la...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm. Escaping every character sounds like it might be workable. I'll give
it a try.
Larry
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Martin Davis mbda...@refractions.netwrote:
Could you still use regex matching on the back end, but just internally
escape the raw string input to turn it into a pattern?
Perhaps
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/util/regex/Pattern.html
??
Stefan Steiniger wrote:
By the way, since it uses the Java pattern matcher, Search All
Attributes supports many different meta-characters to control the search
such as ^ to match the start of a line and $
That's it. I've looked for a better (more user oriented) reference, but
never found one.
Larry
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Martin Davis mbda...@refractions.netwrote:
Perhaps
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/util/regex/Pattern.html
??
Stefan Steiniger wrote:
By the
Yes, that would be nice. The Pattern language is *very* powerful, but
*very* complex too.
Hmm... there's a book in there I think - or at least a nice website.
The language I think follows most common conventions for regex languages
- and I'm pretty sure there's some good general references
Check these out:
http://leepoint.net/notes-java/data/strings/40regular_expressions/05regex.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_expression
Martin Davis wrote:
Yes, that would be nice. The Pattern language is *very* powerful, but
*very* complex too.
Hmm... there's a book in there I
I like the POSIX Basic Regular Expressions section of the Wikipedia
article. Still not for the feint-of-heart.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Martin Davis mbda...@refractions.netwrote:
Check these out:
http://leepoint.net/notes-java/data/strings/40regular_expressions/05regex.html
It looks to me like the syntax for the POSIX character classes is
different on the Wikipedia article to the Java Pattern class. 8^(
(You know what they say about standards...)
These are quite useful, so this could be important to note.
Larry Becker wrote:
I like the POSIX Basic Regular
This subset looks safe enough:
. Matches any single character (many applications exclude newlines, and
exactly which characters are considered newlines is flavor, character
encoding, and platform specific, but it is safe to assume that the line feed
character is included). Within POSIX bracket
Hi,
For a one page cheatsheet, look at
http://www.addedbytes.com/download/regular-expressions-cheat-sheet-v1/pdf/
or
http://www.omicentral.com/cheatsheets/JavaRegularExpressionsCheatSheet.pdf
for a full site dedicated to regex :
http://www.regular-expressions.info/
note : regex is also
By the way, since it uses the Java pattern matcher, Search All
Attributes supports many different meta-characters to control the search
such as ^ to match the start of a line and $ to match the end.
oha..interesting.. how to get to know these chars?
is there a table?
stefan
@Larry : I think that the use of regexes should be mentionned in the
user interface of your search tool
One reason is that the user will have to escape regex metacharacter if
he wants to make a simple search on (, [ ,*...
I agree. I was just intimidated by the complexity of explaining this in a
Larry Becker a écrit :
@Larry : I think that the use of regexes should be mentionned in the
user interface of your search tool
One reason is that the user will have to escape regex metacharacter if
he wants to make a simple search on (, [ ,*...
I agree. I was just intimidated by the
Is it worth having an option to choose plain text or regex? Some text
editors do this. That way if a search string contains some of the
(numerous) special regex chars, the user doesn't have to escape
everything in sight.
M
Michael Michaud wrote:
Larry Becker a écrit :
@Larry : I think
Becker becker.la...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Da: Larry Becker becker.la...@gmail.com
Oggetto: Re: [JPP-Devel] Search tool for Attributes
A: OpenJump develop and use jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Data: Mercoledì 31 dicembre 2008, 23:41
I have completed the Search All Attributes
, Larry Becker becker.la...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Da: Larry Becker becker.la...@gmail.com
Oggetto: Re: [JPP-Devel] Search tool for Attributes
A: OpenJump develop and use jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Data: Mercoledì 31 dicembre 2008, 23:41
I have completed the Search All Attributes
organization.
Regards
Peppe
Happy new Year!
--- Mer 31/12/08, Larry Becker becker.la...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Da: Larry Becker becker.la...@gmail.com
Oggetto: Re: [JPP-Devel] Search tool for Attributes
A: OpenJump develop and use jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Data: Mercoledì 31
selectable layer and a programmatically selectable layer.
Bing
From: Larry Becker
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 4:12 AM
To: OpenJump develop and use
Subject: [JPP-Devel] Search tool for Attributes
Question:
You can use Simple Query to search Attribute fields for specific values,
but have you
--
From: Sunburned Surveyor sunburned.surve...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 11:34 PM
To: OpenJump develop and use jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [JPP-Devel] Search tool for Attributes
Bing,
I had no idea that you could use Lucerne
*Sent:* Tuesday, December 30, 2008 11:13 PM
*To:* OpenJump develop and use jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* Re: [JPP-Devel] Search tool for Attributes
Hi Bing,
Wow! That was an information-rich post. Using Lucene goes way beyond my
usual minimalist approach to feature
*Sent:* Tuesday, December 30, 2008 4:12 AM
*To:* OpenJump develop and use jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
*Subject:* [JPP-Devel] Search tool for Attributes
Question:
You can use Simple Query to search Attribute fields for specific values,
but have you ever wanted to do a Google style
I've already noticed that. That's a nice surprise indeed!
From: Larry Becker
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 2:32 AM
To: OpenJump develop and use
Subject: Re: [JPP-Devel] Search tool for Attributes
... Also, I think that just because something is hidden due to a scale range
I think that would be handy.
SS
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Larry Becker becker.la...@gmail.com wrote:
Question:
You can use Simple Query to search Attribute fields for specific values, but
have you ever wanted to do a Google style search in a map? In other words,
search all
me too! sounds spectacular :) .. now we need to find a fancy name.
stefan
Sunburned Surveyor schrieb:
I think that would be handy.
SS
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Larry Becker becker.la...@gmail.com wrote:
Question:
You can use Simple Query to search Attribute fields for specific
yes, it sounds searchtacular!
eric
On Dec 29, 2008, at 5:56 PM, Stefan Steiniger wrote:
me too! sounds spectacular :) .. now we need to find a fancy name.
stefan
Sunburned Surveyor schrieb:
I think that would be handy.
SS
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Larry Becker
and use
Subject: [JPP-Devel] Search tool for Attributes
Question:
You can use Simple Query to search Attribute fields for specific values, but
have you ever wanted to do a Google style search in a map? In other words,
search all attributes in all layers for any occurrence of one or more
28 matches
Mail list logo
