Luis,
Hello ..
I´m working with isis using iso addressing, so now when i see the routes in
my EX , it has the next:
juni...@junex.cvie.mgmt.01# run show route
inet.0: 13 destinations, 13 routes (13 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
..
Hello ..
I´m working with isis using iso addressing, so now when i see the routes in
my EX , it has the next:
juni...@junex.cvie.mgmt.01# run show route
inet.0: 13 destinations, 13 routes (13 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
...
...
Hello All,
I'm trying to configure an inter provider LDP based L2VPN between a
Juniper network and a Cisco network.
The topology is roughly as follows:
Cisco PE-Cisco P--Cisco P--Cisco ASBR--Juniper
ASBR---Juniper P---Juniper P---Juniper PE.
In order to achieve
* TCIS List Acct
> I've been reading past threads on the SRX line with interest. It seems
> this box can do many of the things we are looking for (at a low price
> point), which include:
>
> - MPLS
> - IPv4 routing (OSPF, BGP)
> - Runs JunOS
> - Could be used at the access layer
> - Future IPv6
Smaller ones as cheap access devices with or without (or even together
with) MPLS—maybe. Check the latest thread on J-series. Just couple of
days ago someone has given a good brief of how they use SRX100 in access
with MPLS.
Full BGP, wire-rate—just forget. You can do full BGP on SRX650 thou
I have two 5XXX series SRX boxes in an Active / Active cluster sitting in the
middle of a network. They currently carry the following: (PIM goes up and down
depending on downstream pulls)
inet.0: 322738 destinations, 968448 routes (322735 active, 2 holddown, 20
hidden)
Restart Complete
> I've been reading past threads on the SRX line with interest. It seems this
> box can do many of the things we are looking for (at a low price point),
> which include:
>
> - MPLS
> - IPv4 routing (OSPF, BGP)
> - Runs JunOS
> - Could be used at the access layer
> - Future IPv6 support
> - If
BGP is slow. Painfully so.
I have 2x SRX3400 in a chassis cluster config getting 2 full BGP tables. I
would say it takes at least 5 minutes for the BGP updates to complete and
for the device to be usable.
IPv6 support will be in 10.2 for SRX3400 and higher. 10.2R1 exists today
but has a number
All,
Thanks a lot for your comments, seems that there are more occasions
where this problem is occurring.
We are having the MX80-48T which has the Trio chip.
It was a bit strange while building the configuration, at some point it
seemed to work the 10.x way. There was ARP, but no connectivity
On an M7i with builtin tunnel PIC running 8.0R2.8, is it possible to
create a GRE tunnel where the destination is at a dynamic IP address? The
destination is on a .dyndns.org hostname.
There is dynamic-tunnels under routing-options but I don't see how that
could help me.
What I want to achieve is
I've been reading past threads on the SRX line with interest. It seems this box
can do many of the things we are looking for (at a low price point), which include:
- MPLS
- IPv4 routing (OSPF, BGP)
- Runs JunOS
- Could be used at the access layer
- Future IPv6 support
- If required, could be us
On Wednesday, July 28, 2010, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 27, 2010 10:31:18 pm Chuck Anderson wrote:
>
>> Finally, JTAC/ATAC can't even figure out the above!!! I
>> have a case open and they *still* haven't come to the
>> solution because they haven't realized that "Today Trio
>> only sup
On Tuesday, July 27, 2010 10:31:18 pm Chuck Anderson wrote:
> Finally, JTAC/ATAC can't even figure out the above!!! I
> have a case open and they *still* haven't come to the
> solution because they haven't realized that "Today Trio
> only supports the old style config" and what that really
> mean
13 matches
Mail list logo
