[j-nsp] Question about bridge-domain MX

2011-09-13 Thread Nguyen Hoang Nam
Dear all ! I have deployed Layer 2 VPN for a customer with 02 sites with different vlan-id as topo below: site-1 - (metro) MX80 ---(metro)--- site-2 (outer 100, inner 100) (outer 200, inner 200) I tested using bridge domain on MX: Config on MX: lab@mxA-1# show

Re: [j-nsp] RSVP reserve 100% of interface BW in Juniper while 75% in Cisco? !!

2011-09-13 Thread Chris Kawchuk
1. RSVP reservations are just that - reservations. They don't actually police/shape/take away available bandwidth on the interface for other traffic. LSPs ask for bandwidth reservations so that further/additional LSPs don't attempt to book their bandwidth on this interface if it's full. (See

Re: [j-nsp] RSVP reserve 100% of interface BW in Juniper while 75% in Cisco? !!

2011-09-13 Thread medrees
Dear Chris Thanks a lot for your reply, in cisco they by default allow 75% from the configured bandwidth value under the interface, and it can be changed to 100% also it can support oversubscription by increasing the bandwidth value under interface to value larger than the actual interface

[j-nsp] FQDN in filter lists

2011-09-13 Thread Joseph Lappa
Hi, Is it possible to have a filter list that have FQDNs in it and not convert it to an IP address at time of commit? We would like to do filter lists with dynamic DNS host names in it. This is for junos 9.4 Thanks! Joe ___ juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] RSVP reserve 100% of interface BW in Juniper while 75% in Cisco? !!

2011-09-13 Thread Chris Kawchuk
Please clarify more this statement (have 5% of the available bandwidth/buffer space) as I understood if the interface is completely utilized using LSP traffic the buffer will be utilized and may starving the control traffic (please correct me) You need to understand the difference between an

Re: [j-nsp] download.juniper.net mime types

2011-09-13 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 01:52:45PM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: Dear Juniper, You guys broke your mime types again, at least for all the 10.4S6.6 service release URLs. :) Sigh... I know nobody wants to bother trying to be standards compliant or testing things on any platform other

Re: [j-nsp] download.juniper.net mime types

2011-09-13 Thread Paul Stewart
Yup... thought it was just me... I use Lynx all the time to download from Juniper (or at least try to) ;( Paul -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Richard A Steenbergen Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Re: [j-nsp] download.juniper.net mime types

2011-09-13 Thread Jared Mauch
I've found most vendors don't think about the actual effort involved in remotely managing or staging devices. Jared Mauch On Sep 13, 2011, at 3:41 PM, Paul Stewart p...@paulstewart.org wrote: Yup... thought it was just me... I use Lynx all the time to download from Juniper (or at least try

Re: [j-nsp] download.juniper.net mime types

2011-09-13 Thread Daniel Stagner
Funny that you say that.. IE is the one browser I don't test against, because it's always been the least compliant/least secure of the browsers. On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 01:52:45PM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: Dear Juniper, You guys

[j-nsp] load Balancing

2011-09-13 Thread Oscar Jimenez Sanabria
Hi Experts We had multiple OC3 links attached to a M320, we are trying to perform load balance of MPLS, L2VPN, L3VPN and IP, but the load balance of MPLS Traffic does not work, because always takes one link for traffic distribuition. Anybody has performed this kind of load balance. There

Re: [j-nsp] download.juniper.net mime types

2011-09-13 Thread Jared Mauch
Actually the problem is that many people don't think you might download with http from a non-browser, etc This means you end up with links that require JavaScript to navigate to them. If you can't download the software with links or lynx then there is a problem. I would take the ability to

Re: [j-nsp] download.juniper.net mime types

2011-09-13 Thread Majdi S. Abbas
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 05:00:08PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote: Actually the problem is that many people don't think you might download with http from a non-browser, etc This means you end up with links that require JavaScript to navigate to them. If you can't download the software with

Re: [j-nsp] download.juniper.net mime types

2011-09-13 Thread Daniel Stagner
Very true. many a pages that I've gone to that I wind up with a Javascript:void(0) instead of an actual linkable object. On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Jared Mauch wrote: Actually the problem is that many people don't think you might download with http from a non-browser, etc This means you end

Re: [j-nsp] download.juniper.net mime types

2011-09-13 Thread Pavel Lunin
Ups. First accidentally unicasted this to RAS yesterday night. Sorry, Richard. Yep. Also discovered this just today, trying to download Junos to a remote machine with links (another text-based browser :). Was really surprised seeing the 180 megs tgz opened as text. But I was surprised even more

Re: [j-nsp] RSVP reserve 100% of interface BW in Juniper while 75% in Cisco? !!

2011-09-13 Thread medrees
Dear Chris Thanks a lot for your clear and professional support. Best Regards, Mohamed Edrees -Original Message- From: Chris Kawchuk [mailto:juniperd...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 6:46 PM To: medrees Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] RSVP reserve