Re: [j-nsp] Practical VPLS examples (SRX and J series)

On Friday 11 November 2011 17:42:29 Mike Williams wrote: So. VPLS. Point-to-multiple-point. Virtual LAN. Brilliant! I managed build up the courage, and time, to have a crack at this today, figuring it could take while. However it took me less than an hour to convert my mesh of l2vpns to a VPLS

[j-nsp] Carrier-of-Carriers question

Hello, Can anyone tell me if it is possible to have Carrier-of-Carriers working scenario with one site implemented with OSPF/LDP and the other using eBGP with labeled-unicast? Thanks in advance, Tasho Shukerski Vivacom Network engineer ___

Re: [j-nsp] Carrier-of-Carriers question

Hi, I don't see why you can't. We have one running in our network. Depending on your CoC node topology, you may need to be extra watchful on potential loops or unefficient routing caused primarily by next-hops being mutually distributed by OSPF/LDP and BGP. On Nov 16, 2011, at 9:41 PM, Tasho

[j-nsp] Last call for participation in the Arbor 2011 WISR opsec survey.

[Apologies if you've already seen this message in other forums.] We'd be grateful if folks who've yet to do so would take a few minutes to participate in the 2011 WISR opsec survey - responses will be tabulated on Sunday, 20Nov11, and input from the operational community is greatly

Re: [j-nsp] Carrier-of-Carriers question

Hello, As far as I understand you are talking of OSPF/LDP and BGP in the same site. Our implementation have the protocols on different sites. I made some tests and the problem I see is that on the site with BGP there are no routes with label advertised towards the client carrier router. There