* Stacy W. Smith st...@acm.org [2013-02-12 01:18]:
Do the KRT error messages go away if you unconfigure sampling? Any
change in the KRT installation time with sampling turned off?
I'll test that. I assume I will need to completely disable the
sampling instance?
This is the only MX80 where we
Which release do you use ? Experienced some mpls mtu issue on trio platform.
Known PR...
Envoyé de mon iPad
Le 12 févr. 2013 à 22:17, Luca Salvatore l...@ninefold.com a écrit :
I have a few sites connected via a VPLS core. The core devices are all MX 10
routers connected via 10Gb fibre.
11.2R5.4 on all MX involved - this was the recommended release up to a few days
ago.
Any ideas on the PR number?
Luca
-Original Message-
From: david@orange.com [mailto:david@orange.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 13 February 2013 8:24 AM
To: Luca Salvatore
Cc:
We use RSVP LSPs and set the Adspec attribute to autodiscover the LSP MTU hop
by hop during the path setup. We also set the MTU on the PE-CE facing
interface. Finally set the VPLS mtu in the routing-instance --- It has to match
on all PEs that we run the VPLS instance, we do this to interop
The PR number is 836197. The PDF is also online for anyone to view it.
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog57/presentations/Tuesday/tue.lightning2.steenbergen.juniper-slowfib.pdf
Liam Hynes
On Feb 11, 2013, at 6:59 PM, Jeff Wheeler wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Sebastian Wiesinger
Interesting...
MX80 running 11.4R6.5 - takes about 5-7 minutes to come online, load BGP
tables and fully converge as a reference point:
inet.0: 446697 destinations, 609039 routes (446678 active, 13 holddown, 17
hidden)
Direct: 21 routes, 21 active
Local:
Here's from an MX-10 in a 68F ambient room with pretty good airflow through the
chassis. This node also has a 2x10Gbps in the box generating some additional
heat.
root@lab-MX# ...cs optics | match temperature | except high | except low
Module temperature: 29
Hi Guys,
I've got a requirement to run LFI (Link Fragmention Interleaving) on an ADSL
Interface on an SRX - this requires the use of MLPPP even though there is only
a single interface.
The customer has a Cisco 877 doing exactly this and it works fine.
With my configuration as it stands,
On Mon, 11 Feb 2013, Jeff Wheeler wrote:
I am sorry I missed Richard Steenbergen's lightning talk at NANOG,
which was something like if you want your routers to install routes,
call Juniper and reference PR#whatever because they do not want to
fix this bug.
It looks like I've beaten him to
I was there for that lightning talk (and very recently seen that feature
actually happening) but what's getting described here by the OP doesn't seem
to be the same maybe I'm misunderstanding.
Paul
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 7:26 AM, JP Velders j...@veldersjes.net wrote:
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:19:16 -0600
From: Chris Wopat m...@falz.net
Subject: [j-nsp] CWDM optics support on EX4500
I tried some 3rd party Cisco coded optics and oddly they're detected as
SFP+.
Dumb question: did
Sort of unrelated, but a quick question in regards to AFL's. I'm looking to
run BGP on a EX4500/4200 mixed mode VC (2 x 4500's, 2 x 4200's for 4
switches total) with the EX4500's as the RE and backup RE (preprovisioned).
Do I only need to purchase the AFL's for the EX4500's or all members of the
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013, Luca Salvatore wrote:
I have a few sites connected via a VPLS core. The core devices are all MX
10 routers connected via 10Gb fibre.
I'm having problems doing file copies (SCP between two Centos VMs).
hi
can you put configuration ? you cam tune up mtu for vpls
Hi,
I looking some info about buffers size in this model ? Are they
configureable ?
thanks for info
regards
Piotr
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
How does one send back an ICMP please-fragment-this Message when you're
emulating a blue wire?
No router in the middle to send back to the customer. it's an L2 service.
You're transparent to them IP-wise. No IP interface anywhere inside their
bridge to source a packet from.
- Ck.
On
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:19:16 -0600
From: Chris Wopat m...@falz.net
Subject: [j-nsp] CWDM optics support on EX4500
I tried some 3rd party Cisco coded optics and oddly they're detected as SFP+.
Dumb question: did you set the port to 1g speed ?
Kind regards,
JP Velders
We hit this PR but should be fixed in your release. Double check with JTAC if
there is no regression or corner case?
David
Problem Report
Number PR568550
Title With default settings,4 bytes lesser ip payload can be sent when MX-80
is acting as P router compared to M7i
Release Note
MPLS MTU
Nice domain.
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos/topics/concept/ex-series-software-licenses-overview.html
For a Virtual Chassis deployment, two license keys are recommended for
redundancy-one for the device in the master role and the other for the device
in the backup role
You do not
My security guys informed me they are getting flows with weird times from
our SRX3600 that I'm having export flows to one of their security boxes.
Time seems to be correct on the routing engine, we use NTP etc and I can't
remember if its possible to log into an FPC directly. The FPC that the
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Rajesh Narang nar...@juniper.net wrote:
It is a documentation error that is being corrected and link will be updated
soon.
Updated:
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos12.3/topics/concept/ex-series-software-licenses-overview.html
Cheers,
Dale
Luca Salvatore l...@ninefold.com writes:
I have a few sites connected via a VPLS core. The core devices are all
MX 10 routers connected via 10Gb fibre. I'm having problems doing file
copies (SCP between two Centos VMs).
The issue is that the file copy never gets anywhere, on the Centos CLI
Thanks for the info.
I have managed to fix it by tweaking the MTU on my 10Gb interfaces between P
routers.
I set the interface MTU to be 1548
Then set the family mpls MTU to be 1522
This seems to have helped.
Luca
From: david@orange.com [mailto:david@orange.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 13
Hi Luca,
I believe this is expected behaviour.
Your VPLS infrastructure only supports max MTU of 14xx (1500- MPLS/VPLS/TE etc
overhead).
If your Layer 3 CPE device connected to the VPLS cloud sets default MTU of 1500
then it will try to send those 1500 byte packets, without knowing that they
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Piotr piotr.1...@interia.pl wrote:
I looking some info about buffers size in this model ? Are they
configureable ?
It is the same chip as the QFX3500 and has similar 10MB buffer for
the whole chip, which is similar to other products in this segment.
It is
* Chris Wopat
I got a few replies off-list about this and others have had no issues. It
definitely appears to be due to these being Cisco and not Juniper coded.
Yep, I've sometimes had weird issues with that were due to coding. For
example, a while back I got some Juniper-coded DAC cables for
Couldn't RPD just reduce the TCP window size for BGP sessions to reduce
the rate at which it can receive routes from neighbouring routers?
This would mean that your FIB would always be synched to your RIB and
other routers would not blackhole by sending traffic to the router in
question (who's FIB
On 2/13/13 10:42 PM, Caillin Bathern wrote:
Couldn't RPD just reduce the TCP window size for BGP sessions to reduce
the rate at which it can receive routes from neighbouring routers?
This would mean that your FIB would always be synched to your RIB and
other routers would not blackhole by
27 matches
Mail list logo
