Re: [j-nsp] EX45xx as datacenter interconnect?

2013-09-26 Thread Alexander Bochmann
...on Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 12:15:38PM +0200, Alexander Bochmann wrote: We've even been floating the idea of dropping in a Virtual Chassis distributed over both sites as interconnection - which seems quite charming, as it Turns out someone else asked just that question on the Juniper

Re: [j-nsp] srx240 | frame-relay t1.606

2013-09-26 Thread Phil Fagan
Looks like only 102 and 107; not 106. On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:50 PM, quinn snyder snyd...@gmail.com wrote: all -- just a quick reachout. trying to dig through docs and either missing the boat or it doesn't exist. either way… i need to know if the srx240 supports the frame-relay

Re: [j-nsp] Matching specific OSPF routes in aggregate policy

2013-09-26 Thread Phil Fagan
Is your aggregate policy already on the MX and is its purpose to export into BGP from OSPF? On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Rob Foehl r...@loonybin.net wrote: Hey folks, Another OSPF issue for the day: I have a somewhat specific need to match a route from a particular OSPF speaker in an

Re: [j-nsp] srx240 | frame-relay t1.606

2013-09-26 Thread Phil Fagan
I was actually refering to t1.102 and t1.107, however, t1.617 is the only supported frame service I see on the SRX. On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:05 PM, quinn snyder snyd...@gmail.com wrote: just to be clear -- t1.606 is not supported. are you referring to t1.602 and t1.607 as being supported?

Re: [j-nsp] Junos BNG PPPoE inside a VPLS

2013-09-26 Thread William Jackson
The reason for the VPLS use is that we have multiple BNG nodes that load share the PPPoE sessions. And to mitigate single points of failure. I believe Juniper might just be looking into this scenario as well. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list

Re: [j-nsp] Matching specific OSPF routes in aggregate policy

2013-09-26 Thread Rob Foehl
On Thu, 26 Sep 2013, Phil Fagan wrote: Is your aggregate policy already on the MX and is its purpose to export into BGP from OSPF? That's the idea... There are disparate contributing routes, and they tend to come and go on a fairly regular basis. Generating like aggregates elsewhere and

Re: [j-nsp] srx240 | frame-relay t1.606

2013-09-26 Thread quinn snyder
thanks, phil! q. -= sent via ipad. please excuse brevity, spelling, and grammar =- On Sep 26, 2013, at 15:59, Phil Fagan philfa...@gmail.com wrote: I was actually refering to t1.102 and t1.107, however, t1.617 is the only supported frame service I see on the SRX. On Thu, Sep 26, 2013

Re: [j-nsp] Junos BNG PPPoE inside a VPLS

2013-09-26 Thread Paul Stewart
I'm curious on the load sharing you mentioned here... So you have a VPLS path from DSLAM going to two different BNG nodes at the same time? How does the PPPOE session setup work - first one to answer? (presuming you are referring to PPPOE) Love to hear more about this as we have talked about

Re: [j-nsp] srx240 | frame-relay t1.606

2013-09-26 Thread quinn snyder
just to be clear -- t1.606 is not supported. are you referring to t1.602 and t1.607 as being supported? q. -= sent via ipad. please excuse brevity, spelling, and grammar =- On Sep 26, 2013, at 13:18, Phil Fagan philfa...@gmail.com wrote: Looks like only 102 and 107; not 106. On Wed,

[j-nsp] Network reachable in multiple routing-instance

2013-09-26 Thread Ahmed -Y
Hi Guys, You can see topology on link below. http://s21.postimg.org/nz2wsuy1z/design.jpg I have plenty of routing-instances (VRFs) on PE but lets say a subnet 10.1.1.0/24 is directly attached with PE via different interfaces in two routing-instances (A, B). It is required to route traffic from

[j-nsp] VRRPD_MISSING_VIP

2013-09-26 Thread John pp
Hey All, Getting these error spammed in our logs, one IRB is getting VRRP packets it seems from some source? I'm thinking its a server inside the network that is trying to use the gateway, but I'm honestly stumped... Any help is GREATLY appreciated Thanks