Re: [j-nsp] punting base address packets to RE

2015-08-27 Thread Michael Hare
All- I realize I may have made some mistakes in my claim based on a misunderstanding of output. My normal final term in my lo0.0 input filter is 'then count $X; then discard'. I added a 'then log' while doing a root cause analysis of why I was seeing a large increase in counter $X. I made

Re: [j-nsp] Policy-statement to match on metrics less than, greater than, or within a range

2015-08-27 Thread Phil Rosenthal
On Aug 27, 2015, at 7:15 AM, Alexander Arseniev arsen...@btinternet.com wrote: There is a floor for MED and it is 0. What You could do is : term 1 then { metric subtract 1000; next term } term 2 from metric 0; then { local-preference 100; accept } You won't be able to keep the

Re: [j-nsp] Policy-statement to match on metrics less than, greater than, or within a range

2015-08-27 Thread Alexander Arseniev
There is a floor for MED and it is 0. What You could do is : term 1 then { metric subtract 1000; next term } term 2 from metric 0; then { local-preference 100; accept } You won't be able to keep the original MED though :-( HTH Thanks Alex On 27/08/2015 05:40, Mark Tinka wrote: On 27/Aug/15