Version 11.4R7.5 and 12.3R6.6.
Configuration in lab is minimal - just peer IP, type internal,
local-address, and remove-private toward RR. Simple eBGP session toward
other end.
Thanks!
BR
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hello!
Does someone use vSRX on the KVM in lab or in production?
Could you show example of XML config from working instance?
I'm trying to install according to this manual:
https://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/vsrx15.1x49/topics/task/multi-task/security-vsrx-with-kvm-installing.html
but the
Hello,
How are you passing in the interfaces? A bridge or PCI-Passthrough?
From my testing with the vSRX it won’t recognize any ge- interfaces unless you
pass at least 3 interfaces in. This is true on both KVM and ESXi, which makes
me think that they silently (Or at least quietly) abort
Hello,
I'm trying to set up IPV6 management IP on QFX 5100 VCF.
IPV6 is not reachable from the outside, while IPV4 works.
The switch can ping itsself but does not see any IPV6 neighbors.
Any idea what goes wrong here?
> show configuration interfaces vme
unit 0 {
family inet {
Hi everybody
A couple of days ago, I sent an email about GRE Keepalive on M10/M20.
I did some more tests on this case. I am using PE-Tunnel on M10/M20. Tunnel
can be configured and works fine but when I try to configure GRE Keepalive
via oam and check the statistics about it I received an
On 28/09/15 11:52, Jackson, William wrote:
The ex3300 does not have this limitation.
FWIW, Juniper have come back and said this is a firmware limitation in
the PHY. Apparently it's some sort of feature conflict or code space
issue w.r.t. MACSEC, and there is some vague possibility of a
The ex3300 does not have this limitation.
William Jackson
Gibtelecom
Email: william.jack...@gibtele.com
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Frank Sweetser
Sent: 23 September 2015 18:05
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
I use it to make sure another admin hasn’t made changes overtop of mine. Also,
I believe commit check can help in situations where you are using “edit
private”.
> On Sep 28, 2015, at 4:24 PM, Martin T wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> when I commit the candidate configuration in Junos,
On 28.09.2015 23:24, Martin T wrote:
Hi,
when I commit the candidate configuration in Junos, I tend to execute
"commit check" and if configuration check succeeds, then I execute
"commit comment ". However, when I think about it, "commit
(comment)" itself should perform those very same checks
Hi,
when I commit the candidate configuration in Junos, I tend to execute
"commit check" and if configuration check succeeds, then I execute
"commit comment ". However, when I think about it, "commit
(comment)" itself should perform those very same checks that "commit
check" does. If yes, then
Hi - "commit check" is just there to verify the syntax and integrity of the
configuration, but do not activate it. Pretty self explanatory as you
already explained it :-)
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Martin T wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when I commit the candidate configuration in
Yes, the commit will fail if commit check would have also failed. I tend to
use commit check as a check on myself when I’ve done a big cut-and-paste, or
when creating a bunch of objects. The time to fail of commit check is less
than commit if there are discrepancies.
On Sep 28, 2015, at
I echo what Harald mentions, I also follow with 'commit check' after using
'commit confirmed <> comment <> | display detail | no-more'
The | display detail is very handy when dealing with SRX with huge
configurations or in clusters that can take a worrying amount of time to
complete (especially
13 matches
Mail list logo