Re: [j-nsp] EX4600 Vs QFX 5100 VS ACX 5048

So the Cisco 5001 is the direct competitor to the Juniper ACX5048. Both seem to be based off the Broadcom Trident II. Mark can you give me more details on the reasons why the Broadcom based offerings are such a bad option? I know you like the ASR920, but 4 10G ports is not enough. Aaron, do you

Re: [j-nsp] EX4600 Vs QFX 5100 VS ACX 5048

On 29/Apr/16 22:28, Colton Conor wrote: > Aaron, > > Thanks for the information and real world examples. Great to hear you got > Cisco and Juniper to work together as well. Sounds like you had Cisco in > your network today, and are adding Juniper. What was the business case or > reason for

Re: [j-nsp] EX4600 Vs QFX 5100 VS ACX 5048

Yw Colton Yes we are mostly cisco as we deployed an mpls network a few years back with asr9k core and me3600 distribution… asr901 at cell sites… Yes Colton cisco has 1U box, more about that below… NCS5K Agreed Colton the ASR920 tops out at too few 10 gig interfaces to be considered

Re: [j-nsp] EX4600 Vs QFX 5100 VS ACX 5048

Aaron, Thanks for the information and real world examples. Great to hear you got Cisco and Juniper to work together as well. Sounds like you had Cisco in your network today, and are adding Juniper. What was the business case or reason for this? Is it because Cisco does not have a similar MEF 10G

Re: [j-nsp] EX4600 Vs QFX 5100 VS ACX 5048

I recently purchased several ACX5048's and am testing and deploying them as we speak...all in all, I'm pleased thus far. This is pretty much my first experience with Juniper/MPLS devices. I got a working scenario as of yesterday of EVPLAN (MEF-speak for ELAN with tagging on PE-CE

Re: [j-nsp] MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP at 1G speed

Or you can consider a new feature called Fusion ;) http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos14.2/information-products/pathway-pages/junos-fusion/junos-fusion.html Michael Loftis писал 26.04.2016 17:07: Yeah those are specifically NOT 1/10, just 10G. In general with the big MXes the MICs

Re: [j-nsp] EX4600 Vs QFX 5100 VS ACX 5048

The ACX has many more MPLS and CE features compared to the QFX. On Apr 29, 2016, at 11:35 AM, Colton Conor wrote: Besides port count and expansion modules, what is the main differences between these three Juniper switches (actually Juniper has the ACX under their router

[j-nsp] EX4600 Vs QFX 5100 VS ACX 5048

Besides port count and expansion modules, what is the main differences between these three Juniper switches (actually Juniper has the ACX under their router section on their website). I believe all three use Broadcom Trident II chips. This Juniper doc says: Even though QFX5100 and EX4600

Re: [j-nsp] LDP flaps specifically present on ACX Juniper routers (ACX4000 and ACX1100)

Thanks Alexandre, I meant the LDP RIDi recall hearing something about the LDP RID needing to be a /32 and ip-reachable from adjacent (T)LDP neighbors. Aaron root@r8-j> show configuration interfaces lo0.0 family inet | display set set interfaces lo0 unit 0 family inet address 1.1.1.8/32

Re: [j-nsp] LDP flaps specifically present on ACX Juniper routers (ACX4000 and ACX1100)

Hi All, Aaron, Not all ldp interfaces are /32, my loopbacks are /32s other interfaces attached to the ldp process are p2p links with /31 masks. Alexandre, Thank you, I have applied the filters to our devices. I will monitor and advise. On 28 April 2016 at 23:43, Alexandre Guimaraes <