Re: [j-nsp] Next-Hop Verification for static route WITHOUT BFD

2016-10-25 Thread Stefan Stoyanov
Hi Alex, Try to check if "ip-monitoring" will fits your needs. ( https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content=KB25052 ) On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 8:20 PM, Alexander Marhold wrote: > Hi ! > > > > In the old Junoe E router we could use RTR to verify a next-hop

[j-nsp] Very basic question about MPLS and RSVP's place in the design

2016-10-25 Thread Scott Granados
Hi, this is a very basic question at least I think it is, apologies for being so green in advance. I’m trying to wrap my head around MPLS and have built a small lab. I understand how provider routers label switch packets and how provider edges use VRF instances and their distinguishers and

[j-nsp] Next-Hop Verification for static route WITHOUT BFD

2016-10-25 Thread Alexander Marhold
Hi ! In the old Junoe E router we could use RTR to verify a next-hop for a static route when the neighbor is not able or willing to do BFD host1(config)#ip route 10.1.1.5 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.5 fastEthernet 1/0 verify rtr 5 last-resort I do not find any good example of doing this on a

Re: [j-nsp] Suggestion for Junos Version MX104

2016-10-25 Thread Olivier Benghozi
About SRRD: - CPU usage: beware of PR1170656. Told to be fixed in 14.2R7 15.1R4 15.1F6. - Mem usage: beware of PR1187721. Told to be fixed only in future or service releases (14.2R8 15.1R5 15.1F6-S2 16.1R3). > On 25 oct. 2016 at 14:23, Mark Tinka wrote : > On 25/Oct/16

Re: [j-nsp] Suggestion for Junos Version MX104

2016-10-25 Thread Rodrigo 1telecom
When using version 14.1 we had some trouble to run ipfix in sampling 1000:1 ... I have a decrease on interface traffic, when disable it the traffic come up again We change this router, but i have to put on-line again and update to 14.2 Using other mx-104 under j-tac recommended version(

Re: [j-nsp] Suggestion for Junos Version MX104

2016-10-25 Thread Mark Tinka
On 25/Oct/16 14:16, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: > We see significantly higher rpd CPU usage for a while after IPfix flow > export is enabled. However, it seems to settle down to normal levels. Yes, that's normally SRRD (Sampling Route-Record Daemon) starting up and making sure all is well for the

Re: [j-nsp] Suggestion for Junos Version MX104

2016-10-25 Thread sthaug
> > Well, IPfix flow export certainly won't make the RE any *faster* :-) > > That said, we are actually exporting IPfix info from a few of our > > MX104s, and it seems to work as expected. > > The MX does the export inline, so the RE is not impacted, which is nice. We see significantly higher

Re: [j-nsp] Suggestion for Junos Version MX104

2016-10-25 Thread Mark Tinka
On 25/Oct/16 12:26, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: > > Well, IPfix flow export certainly won't make the RE any *faster* :-) > That said, we are actually exporting IPfix info from a few of our > MX104s, and it seems to work as expected. The MX does the export inline, so the RE is not impacted, which

Re: [j-nsp] Suggestion for Junos Version MX104

2016-10-25 Thread Mark Tinka
On 25/Oct/16 12:20, Rodrigo 1telecom wrote: > Mark, if i want to use flow by ipfix too?! Works fine for us. Inline flow sampling... Mark. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Suggestion for Junos Version MX104

2016-10-25 Thread Peter Sikora
Thanks for all the feedback! >-Original Message- >From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mark.ti...@seacom.mu] >Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 11:17 AM >To: Peter Sikora ; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Suggestion for Junos Version MX104 > > >The MX104 is

Re: [j-nsp] Suggestion for Junos Version MX104

2016-10-25 Thread sthaug
> Mark, if i want to use flow by ipfix too?! Well, IPfix flow export certainly won't make the RE any *faster* :-) That said, we are actually exporting IPfix info from a few of our MX104s, and it seems to work as expected. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no

Re: [j-nsp] Suggestion for Junos Version MX104

2016-10-25 Thread Rodrigo 1telecom
Mark, if i want to use flow by ipfix too?! Enviado via iPhone  Grupo Connectoway > Em 25 de out de 2016, às 06:16, Mark Tinka escreveu: > > > >> On 25/Oct/16 10:59, Peter Sikora wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> currently we have two MX104 running with JUNOS 13.3R8.7 and we

Re: [j-nsp] Suggestion for Junos Version MX104

2016-10-25 Thread Mark Tinka
On 25/Oct/16 10:59, Peter Sikora wrote: > Hi, > > currently we have two MX104 running with JUNOS 13.3R8.7 and we want to update > them soon. > If possible I want to install a newer release than 13.3. > Does somebody of you have experiences with 15.1 or 14.2 and that device types? The MX104 is

[j-nsp] Suggestion for Junos Version MX104

2016-10-25 Thread Peter Sikora
Hi, currently we have two MX104 running with JUNOS 13.3R8.7 and we want to update them soon. If possible I want to install a newer release than 13.3. Does somebody of you have experiences with 15.1 or 14.2 and that device types? Thanks for your help! Best regards, Peter Peter Sikora