Re: [j-nsp] QFX5100 vs ACX5048

2018-07-22 Thread Colton Conor
Strange we had no issues upgrading from 17.3R2 from 15.1X. On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 2:27 PM, Gustavo Santos wrote: > Yes... Exactly. > > I upgraded to 17.3R2 and was a total mess. And had to downgrade to 15.1X > train. > > > On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 11:31 AM Colton Conor > wrote: > >> Gustavo,

Re: [j-nsp] 6PE without family inet6 labeled-unicast

2018-07-22 Thread Pavel Lunin
Errata >So your BGP route will not be inactive because of the unreachable next-hop. So your BGP route *will be* inactive because of the unreachable next-hop. On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 11:52 PM, Pavel Lunin wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Andrey Kostin wrote: > >> Hi Pavel, >> >>

Re: [j-nsp] 6PE without family inet6 labeled-unicast

2018-07-22 Thread Pavel Lunin
On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 9:45 PM, Andrey Kostin wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > Thanks for replying. I understand how it works as soon as proper next-hop > is present in a route. My attention was attracted by implicit next-hop > conversion from pure IPv4 address to IPv4-mapped IPv6 next-hop from >

Re: [j-nsp] 6PE without family inet6 labeled-unicast

2018-07-22 Thread Andrey Kostin
Hi Pavel, Thanks for replying. I understand how it works as soon as proper next-hop is present in a route. My attention was attracted by implicit next-hop conversion from pure IPv4 address to IPv4-mapped IPv6 next-hop from "Nexthop: YYY.YYY.155.141" in the advertised route to "Protocol next

Re: [j-nsp] 6PE without family inet6 labeled-unicast

2018-07-22 Thread Dan Peachey
Hey, Other posters are correct... IPv6 routes are not requied, it forwards based on received label as next hop is already known. Confused myself as I was distributing full IPv6 table in my lab testing and assumed it was working because of that, but it's not the case. Cheers, Dan On Sun, 22

Re: [j-nsp] 6PE without family inet6 labeled-unicast

2018-07-22 Thread Andrey Kostin
Hi Pedro, Thanks for your comment. I agree with you that penultimate LSP forwards traffic based on received label without IPv6 lookup. In my scenario, default PHP is used and all routers have family inet6 configured, so it just works. Pedro Marques Antunes via juniper-nsp писал 21.07.2018

Re: [j-nsp] 6PE without family inet6 labeled-unicast

2018-07-22 Thread Andrey Kostin
Hi Dan, Thanks for answering. All routers have family inet6 configured on all participating interfaces, because other v6 traffic is forwarded without MPLS, so we are safe for that. Kind regards, Andrey Dan Peachey писал 20.07.2018 16:40: Hi, Presumably the penultimate LSR has the