On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 03:41:40PM -0800, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
> Nathan Ward [nw...@daork.net] wrote:
> > Hi Chris, check out the forward-only-replies option, pretty sure there was
> > some stuff there I had to fiddle with.
> >
> > Can you post your config?
> >
>
> I'm using the bootp helper
Aaron1 [aar...@gvtc.com] wrote:
> I use the per-vrf dhcp-relay in ACX5048
Yeah when I use that I have both 1. a similar problem (replies are not
sent to the destination vrf) and 2. the router won't forward replies to
destination PE routers anymore.
___
I use the per-vrf dhcp-relay in ACX5048
Aaron
> On Dec 19, 2018, at 5:41 PM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
>
> Nathan Ward [nw...@daork.net] wrote:
>> Hi Chris, check out the forward-only-replies option, pretty sure there was
>> some stuff there I had to fiddle with.
>>
>> Can you post your config?
Nathan Ward [nw...@daork.net] wrote:
> Hi Chris, check out the forward-only-replies option, pretty sure there was
> some stuff there I had to fiddle with.
>
> Can you post your config?
>
I'm using the bootp helper instead of the dhcp-relay feature. I don't know
if 'fud' handles both. When I
Aaron1 [aar...@gvtc.com] wrote:
> Dang typos...
>
> Did you apply local prefix leaking feature using auto-export to get multiple
> vrfs talking on same PE ?
>
> https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/release-independent/nce/topics/concept/auto-export-overview.html
>
I'm using
@Tom: Oh sure, hardlinks are rife and a HTTP 301 might be a bit crude.
I favour what Chris suggests.
Getting rather too involved in this no doubt ... but I wonder how we are all
defining 'deprecated'.
My dictionary says 'in the process of being replaced' --- which I take to
mean (employing the
Tom Beecher [beec...@beecher.cc] wrote:
> Lots of people (for better or for worse) may have hard linked / referenced
> KB15585 in their documentation, so IMO it's a good idea to leave it up with
> a bolded note of depreciation, which is what they did.
>
Just erase the rest of the KB after this
Lots of people (for better or for worse) may have hard linked / referenced
KB15585 in their documentation, so IMO it's a good idea to leave it up with
a bolded note of depreciation, which is what they did.
Expecting a bit of RTFM on the end user isn't that much, IMO.
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at
Dang typos...
Did you apply local prefix leaking feature using auto-export to get multiple
vrfs talking on same PE ?
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/release-independent/nce/topics/concept/auto-export-overview.html
Aaron
> On Dec 19, 2018, at 1:13 PM, Aaron1 wrote:
>
> aside
aside from proper RT import/export...
Auto export to get multiple vrfs taking on some PE ?
Aaron
> On Dec 19, 2018, at 12:57 PM, Chris Cappuccio wrote:
>
> I have no trouble with dhcp relay between VRFs across MPLS PE routers,
> but across VRFs on the same router, the relay daemon fud fails.
I have no trouble with dhcp relay between VRFs across MPLS PE routers,
but across VRFs on the same router, the relay daemon fud fails.
If I turn on debugging, I am always getting:
Dec 18 19:49:06 FUD_RTSOCK_MSG_FAILURE: Unable to get prefix match: No such
file or directory
Dec 18 19:49:06 reply
Hi Pasvorn, Aaron D,
Sure - I just find it odd that the FTP instructions are still part of the KB
(if FTP is retired, then the instructions will never work again, so it's a
mite misleading to leave them up).
YMMV, IMHO, etc.
Happy SFTPing folks!
Br,
Niall
-Original Message-
From:
Definitely. You can file a report with the “feedback” button on that page and
it will get updated.
> On Dec 19, 2018, at 10:16 AM, Niall Donaghy wrote:
>
> Thanks Saku and Aaron.
>
> My point is KB15585 should be retired if FTP is no longer supported. =)
>
> -Original Message-
>
Thanks Saku and Aaron.
My point is KB15585 should be retired if FTP is no longer supported. =)
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Gould [mailto:aar...@gvtc.com]
Sent: 19 December 2018 16:41
To: 'Saku Ytti' ; Niall Donaghy
Cc: aaron.dew...@gmail.com; 'Juniper List'
Subject: RE: [j-nsp]
Thanks Jeff, perhaps AC Highcap ship with different default dip setting than
do the DC Highcap... I can tell you this all 6 of my MX960's with DC
highcap pem's came with dip set to 0 (1700w)...
Ok so today I did this in my lab-960...
Had someone flip the dip to 1 (4100w) on all 4 PEM's,
Yep works, thanks (Niall, use sftp.juniper.net not ftp.juniper.net)
C:\Users\aaron>sftp anonym...@sftp.juniper.net
Password authentication
Password:
Connected to anonym...@sftp.juniper.net.
sftp> pwd
Remote working directory: /pub/incoming
- Aaron
╰─ sftp anonym...@sftp.juniper.net
Connecting to sftp.juniper.net...
key_from_blob: remaining bytes in key blob 36
key_to_blob: unsupported key type 11
Password authentication
Password:
sftp>
On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 at 18:20, Niall Donaghy wrote:
>
> I just tried and find neither ftp nor sftp work
I just tried and find neither ftp nor sftp work with ftp.juniper.net.
The relevant KB article hasn't been updated recently.
I wonder if a fault or administrative error/delay with the KB update...
How to reliably and securely FTP files to JTAC
Article ID: KB15585
Last Updated: 03 Mar 2017
I thought it was pending shutdown in favor of sftp. But I haven’t been paying
that much attention.
> On Dec 19, 2018, at 8:44 AM, Aaron Gould wrote:
>
> Does juniper's ftp.juniper.net still work ?
>
>
>
> I haven't been able to use it in a few weeks.
>
>
>
> -Aaron
>
>
Does juniper's ftp.juniper.net still work ?
I haven't been able to use it in a few weeks.
-Aaron
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Once upon a time, Simon Lockhart said:
> On Thu Dec 13, 2018 at 10:41:49AM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Oh yeah, that of course makes sense... I didn't think of checking that.
> > On an MX204, the "power-on" option has no additional completions, so
> > probably just errors out. I already boxed
On Thu Dec 13, 2018 at 10:41:49AM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Oh yeah, that of course makes sense... I didn't think of checking that.
> On an MX204, the "power-on" option has no additional completions, so
> probably just errors out. I already boxed up the new MX204, and I'm not
> going to test it
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 1:49 PM Luis Balbinot wrote:
>
> Mini heart attacks :-)
>
> Now seriously, I’ve seen none so far.
>
> On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 at 07:40 Sebastian Wiesinger
> wrote:
>
> > * Phil Shafer [2018-09-01 20:28]:
> > > "commit full" helps when daemons miss config changes (which they
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
