Re: [j-nsp] EX4600 or QFX5110

There is also a Compare function where you can select two or more products and compare all the features side-by-side. On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 10:14:55PM +, Anderson, Charles R wrote: > Check feature explorer, select EX4600, latest Junos: > > https://apps.juniper.net/feature-explorer/ > >

Re: [j-nsp] EX4600 or QFX5110

Check feature explorer, select EX4600, latest Junos: https://apps.juniper.net/feature-explorer/ EVPN with VXLAN data plane encapsulation Junos OS 18.2R1 EVPN-VXLAN support of Virtual Chassis and Virtual Chassis Fabric Junos OS 18.2R1 Tunneling Q-in-Q traffic through an EVPN-VXLAN overlay network

Re: [j-nsp] EX4600 or QFX5110

Hi, Thank you all for sharing your expertise. I am wondering if the EX4600 supports VXLAN as VXLAN-to-VLAN. I see many parts of the documentation which refers to VXLAN, such as https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/concept/vxlan-constraints-qfx-series.html, but the

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 in 2-post rack?

You can probably use some 4-post conversion kits to mount it in 2-post.. The mounts/rails on the MX204 are very similar to the other 1RU QFX mounts. Either flush or center-mount: https://www.racksolutions.com/2-post-conversion-brackets.html

[j-nsp] minimum permissions for napalm/pyez user

Hello! We are attempting to use Napalm which I understand is using pyez/netconf over ssh under the hood. We can get things to work with a full admin level user, but we'd like to pare down the access to only what is required. right now we are specifically hitting an issue where when we run

[j-nsp] 400G is coming?

Hi juniper-nsp, Accidentally found that MX series datasheet now mentions MPC-10E with 400G ports https://www.juniper.net/assets/us/en/local/pdf/datasheets/1000597-en.pdf "The MPC-10E line card is a key contributor to the service provider transformation in the cloud era when deployed with

Re: [j-nsp] EX4600 or QFX5110

Hi guys, My 0.02: we use QFX5100 in VC and it's pretty solid. But. As mentioned, it's a single logical switch and by design it can't run members with different Junos versions that means downtime when you need to upgrade it. There is an ISSU but it has it's own caveats, so be prepared to

[j-nsp] MX204 in 2-post rack?

Is anyone running the MX204 in a 2-post rack? How is it holding up? Spec sheet says it requires 4-post, which is a non-start in many of our locations. Thanks, Rick ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net