On 24/Jan/20 08:49, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> When we asked JNPR why Jericho instead of Paradise, as we see these
> chips for the same market, JNPR told that main motivation was OAM
> features which they lack in Paradise but need in metro.
The OAM story came up as well, as being the major
On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 22:52, Mark Tinka wrote:
> If I'm honest, what I've noticed with most traditional vendors selling
> Broadcom-based boxes is they are touting "price" as the killer use-case
When we asked JNPR why Jericho instead of Paradise, as we see these
chips for the same market, JNPR
On 23/Jan/20 23:17, quinn snyder wrote:
> That would be something like the NCS540.
> Its not an apples-to-apples comparison — as the 540 runs XR and the usual
> things that come with that. There were some threads about it in [c-nsp] —
> might be something to explore. I feel its a bit
On 23/Jan/20 23:02, Colton Conor wrote:
> What is Cisco's upgrade path from the ASR920 if you need more 10G ports?
NCS540, which for me, is a broken path.
We are pushing for other considerations, but I'm not holding my breath.
Mark.
___
juniper-nsp
> From: Mark Tinka
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 9:21 AM
>
> On 23/Jan/20 10:55, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote:
>
> > But it's gonna be your only choice if you want to do any sensible
> > automation (or Junos).
>
> Over the past 10 years of hearing about all the buzz words, it's very
That would be something like the NCS540.
Its not an apples-to-apples comparison — as the 540 runs XR and the usual
things that come with that. There were some threads about it in [c-nsp] —
might be something to explore. I feel its a bit heavyweight for the metro, but
it gives you
What is Cisco's upgrade path from the ASR920 if you need more 10G ports?
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 2:52 PM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 23/Jan/20 16:00, Shamen Snyder wrote:
>
> > I have been following the ACX 710 for a while now. We have a use case
> > in rural markets where we need a dense 10G
On 23/Jan/20 16:00, Shamen Snyder wrote:
> I have been following the ACX 710 for a while now. We have a use case
> in rural markets where we need a dense 10G hardened 1 RU box.
>
> Looks like a promising box, hope the price is right. If not we may
> have to jump to Cisco ASR920s
If I'm
Once upon a time, Chris Adams said:
> We have some route policy applied based on communities set directly on
> static routes. That works fine for us (with a 2-byte ASN), but doesn't
> appear to accept 4-byte ASN long communities. I just get an error about
> an invalid community.
>
> Am I
We have some route policy applied based on communities set directly on
static routes. That works fine for us (with a 2-byte ASN), but doesn't
appear to accept 4-byte ASN long communities. I just get an error about
an invalid community.
Am I missing something, or does JUNOS not support this?
--
I have been following the ACX 710 for a while now. We have a use case in
rural markets where we need a dense 10G hardened 1 RU box.
Looks like a promising box, hope the price is right. If not we may have to
jump to Cisco ASR920s
4 100/40G (can be channelized to 4x25G or 4x10G) interfaces, 24
I had that conversation the again other day - someone said they were
working on "automation" and when I probed deeper it revealed some (very
useful, albeit not scalable) scripting. 'You keep using that word. I do not
think it means what you think it means' seems to be the gist of most
"automation"
On 23/Jan/20 10:55, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote:
> But it's gonna be your only choice if you want to do any sensible automation
> (or Junos).
Over the past 10 years of hearing about all the buzz words, it's very
safe to say that "automation" is whatever it means to you :-).
Mark.
> Mark Tinka
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2020 6:46 PM
>
> On 22/Jan/20 20:39, Tim Durack wrote:
>
> > If you can stomach the BU wars, UADP is a nice ASIC - I think the
> > Cat9k has legs, but the Enterprise BU is definitely in a parallel
> > universe. I asked about porting XR to run on UADP.
> Mark Tinka
> Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2020 7:01 AM
>
> This is one of the reasons operators with enough in-house coding skill are
> seriously looking to build (or already building) their own routers with
DPDK
> on white boxes + friends, even if those solutions may be proprietary and
> used
15 matches
Mail list logo
