Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 - Update!

2020-07-29 Thread Shamen Snyder
Heads up on the ACX5448. There is a major LDP bug in the recommend code 19.3R2-S3. LDP hellos are punted to the RE In queue rx-unknown-mc instead of rxq-l3-nc-hi. A major shift in multicast on our network dropped LDP neighbors. The issue doesn’t happen in 20.2R1 if you find it’s stable (I

Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 - Update!

2020-07-29 Thread Shamen Snyder
The Juniper Bolan architecture is suppose to have an AC variant. Hardened (-40C to 65C), compact (445m x 221mm x 250mm) form factor – suitable for cabinets in pre-aggregation network layer • 2 Routing Engine slots, 1:1 redundant control and forwarding/switching plane • 320Gb/s and 2.4 Tb/s RP

Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 - Update!

2020-07-29 Thread mt
Exactly!!! my SE confirmed that there the ACX710 will be shipped with only DC power supply. I really don't know what the Juniper engineering team are thinking, they are forgetting the basic things. They're focusing on a unique customer requirement, and for me this is a absurd. mt Em

Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 - Update!

2020-07-29 Thread Mark Tinka
On 29/Jul/20 20:18, Baldur Norddahl wrote: > I am also going to get a few ACX5448 for our datacentre locations. I am > still considering getting some AC to DC powersupplies for the ACX710 > because the cost saving is considerable. It is not like finding AC to DC > devices is hard - every laptop

Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 - Update!

2020-07-29 Thread Baldur Norddahl
I am planning to deploy ACX710 with maybe 20 units (which for us is a huge number). We would have ordered DC in any case, so that is a non issue. We will have them at CO buildings were DC is what you get and maybe in the future in road side cabinets, where DC is the easy way to have some battery

Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 - Update!

2020-07-29 Thread Mark Tinka
On 29/Jul/20 15:49, Eric Van Tol wrote: > We ran into this, too. We signed up to beta test at the beginning of this > year and nowhere, not even in discussions with our SE (who also wasn't told > by Juniper), was it mentioned it was a DC-only device. Imagine my surprise > when I received the

Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 - Update!

2020-07-29 Thread Eric Van Tol
We ran into this, too. We signed up to beta test at the beginning of this year and nowhere, not even in discussions with our SE (who also wasn't told by Juniper), was it mentioned it was a DC-only device. Imagine my surprise when I received the box and it was DC only. Such a disappointment.

Re: [j-nsp] ACX5448 & ACX710 - Update!

2020-07-29 Thread Mark Tinka
So an update on this thread... Juniper went ahead and made the ACX710 a DC-only box. So if you are an AC house, you're in deep doo-doo (which is us). DC, for large scale deployment in the Metro? Makes zero sense to me. Apparently, no way around this; which, to me, smells of the box being built

Re: [j-nsp] BGP output queue priorities between RIBs/NLRIs

2020-07-29 Thread Rob Foehl
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020, Jeffrey Haas wrote: - "show bgp output-scheduler" is empty without top-level "protocols bgp output-queue-priority" config, regardless of anything else - Top-level "protocols bgp family evpn signaling" priority config -- and nothing else within that stanza -- broke every