Re: [j-nsp] MX204 port 1G

Hello again After long debugging I have just found a solution to the problem. I had enable vlan tagging on remote side… > Wiadomość napisana przez aar...@gvtc.com w dniu 09.10.2020, o godz. 19:35: > > I found a few things in my notes from when I deployed a few MX204's ... > > Early on I

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 port 1G

i see ge interfaces in my SRX300 and older SRX240... also I'm pretty sure legacy MX use ge for 1 gig inerfaces, and perhaps it's just those newer MX204/10003 that don't. user1@my-srx> show version Hostname: my-srx Model: srx300 Junos: 15.1X49-D170.4 JUNOS Software Release [15.1X49-D170.4]

Re: [j-nsp] Junos OS Evolved

    Well this is coming from my experience with QFX5100, less of an issue with MX platforms but still for the price tag it was kinda hellish.     Been stable after we worked some of the pitfalls... still got some chipset related issue when someone makes an error and mix L2 VLANs with VLAN-CCC

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 port 1G

Once upon a time, Łukasz Trąbiński said: > In Lab I'm trying to set up 1G port on MX204. I've got several 1G ports on MX204 running okay with the same combo you showed (chassis config to speed 10g and gigether-options speed 1g) on 18.4R2.7 on 18.1R2.5 - no other config required (so not tweaking

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 port 1G

I found a few things in my notes from when I deployed a few MX204's ... Early on I had Junos: 17.4R2.4 and 1 gig SFP's wouldn't work... said UNSUPPORTED for 1 gig sfp's 4,5,7 root@lab-mx204> show chassis hardware Hardware inventory: Item Version Part number Serial number

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 port 1G

--- Begin Message --- Thanks. So only SRX/MX use xe only for 1/10 capable interfaces. 40/100 are et. Richard McGovern Sr Sales Engineer, Juniper Networks 978-618-3342 I’d rather be lucky than good, as I know I am not good I don’t make the news, I just report it On 10/9/20, 1:08 PM,

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 port 1G

? " For MX/SRX (and I assume PTX and maybe ACX - don't much deal with those products ) xe is ONLY name allowed" ? I see otherwise... MX... MPC7E-MRATE (however et is the name for 40 gig and 100 gig) xe is also used, but with colon notation) Physical interface: xe-0/1/5:3, Enabled, Physical

Re: [j-nsp] Junos OS Evolved

Like many things either it works or it doesn't. I'm not a fan of paying for software with bugs personally. We do have Evo in use. Sent from my iCar > On Oct 9, 2020, at 12:55 PM, Alain Hebert wrote: > > Nice another round of customers doing JNP QA :( > > - > Alain Hebert

Re: [j-nsp] Junos OS Evolved

    Nice another round of customers doing JNP QA :( - Alain Hebertaheb...@pubnix.net PubNIX Inc. 50 boul. St-Charles P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7 Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.netFax: 514-990-9443 On 2020-10-09 12:38, Saku

Re: [j-nsp] Junos OS Evolved

--- Begin Message --- I think QFX5200-32C (and some PTX?) are only platforms that have support for both a Junos version and an EVO version. I think once [very hard if not impossible] to change. FYI only Richard McGovern Sr Sales Engineer, Juniper Networks 978-618-3342 I’d rather be lucky

Re: [j-nsp] Junos OS Evolved

Hey Colton, > I was unaware of Junos OS Evolved until recently. At what version did > regular Junos evolve into Junos OS Evolved? Is there a certain version > where after that version, everything ongoing is Junos OS Evolved? I think EVO appeared in 19.1, but in most cases you don't have a

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 port 1G

On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 11:49 AM Dave Bell wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 at 16:28, David Miller wrote: >> >> If you are using RFC 1918 private addresses, then you will want to >> remove them from the Junos martian dropping. >> >> Like: >> set routing-options martians 192.168.0.0/16 exact allow >>

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 port 1G

On Fri, 9 Oct 2020 at 16:28, David Miller wrote: > If you are using RFC 1918 private addresses, then you will want to > remove them from the Junos martian dropping. > > Like: > set routing-options martians 192.168.0.0/16 exact allow > > Info: > >

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 port 1G

If you are using RFC 1918 private addresses, then you will want to remove them from the Junos martian dropping. Like: set routing-options martians 192.168.0.0/16 exact allow Info: https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/topic-map/recognize-martian-addr-routing.html --

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 port 1G

--- Begin Message --- If link is up, not L1 (speed negotiation) issue. What do you get for output of show interface xe-0/1/4 extensive? Richard McGovern Sr Sales Engineer, Juniper Networks 978-618-3342 I’d rather be lucky than good, as I know I am not good I don’t make the news, I just report

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 port 1G

One of many working 204s with 1G. Model: mx204 Junos: 18.2R3-S1.7 Chassis: PIC 1 BUILTIN BUILTIN 8XSFPP PIC Xcvr 0 @(+ NON-JNPR F179CO14506 SFP-LX10 Xcvr 1NON-JNPR F179CO14505 SFP-LX10 Xcvr 2 Et

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 port 1G

When I removed "speed 10g" from chassis section admin@mx1> show configuration |compare rollback 1 [edit chassis fpc 0 pic 1] - port 4 { - speed 10g; - } and bounced FPC 0, interface not found. admin@mx1> show interfaces xe-0/1/4 error: device xe-0/1/4 not found In

[j-nsp] Junos OS Evolved

I was unaware of Junos OS Evolved until recently. At what version did regular Junos evolve into Junos OS Evolved? Is there a certain version where after that version, everything ongoing is Junos OS Evolved? ___ juniper-nsp mailing list

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 port 1G

I tried to play with almost all options in gigether-options section without any results. Port is UP but it still not working properly. admin@mx1> show configuration interfaces xe-0/1/4 description TEST; gigether-options { no-flow-control; no-auto-negotiation; speed 1g; } unit 0

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 port 1G

--- Begin Message --- Correct. Unlike EX/QFX where for 1/10 capable interfaces the name will match the insert Optic. 1G Optic shows as ge, 10G Optic shows as xe. Both ge/xe names allowed. For MX/SRX (and I assume PTX and maybe ACX - don't much deal with those products ) xe is ONLY name

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 port 1G

--- Begin Message --- Just chimed in to agree with Tobias. Speed 1g definitely needed. Recently migrated from an mx104 to an mx204 with remote end being a different AS. Mx204 end was link up but remote end was not. In our case the diff in 'show int $x' output implied that the mx104's

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 port 1G

Hi, Am 09.10.2020 um 13:12 schrieb Łukasz Trąbiński: In Lab I'm trying to set up 1G port on MX204. You might need to play around with autoneg options. we have a working 1G LX SFP running on 18.4R1-S7 on MX204 in our case thats the gigether section: gigether-options { no-flow-control;

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 port 1G

Hi. It does not work. according to the documentation it must be xe- > Wiadomość napisana przez Jackson, William w > dniu 09.10.2020, o godz. 13:42: > > Rename the interface ge-0/1/4 > > admin@mx1> show interfaces xe-0/1/4 >Physical interface: xe-0/1/4, Enabled, Physical link is Up >

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 port 1G

Rename the interface ge-0/1/4 admin@mx1> show interfaces xe-0/1/4 Physical interface: xe-0/1/4, Enabled, Physical link is Up Interface index: 154, SNMP ifIndex: 530 Description: TEST Link-level type: Ethernet, MTU: 1514, MRU: 1522, LAN-PHY mode, Speed:

[j-nsp] MX204 port 1G

Hello In Lab I'm trying to set up 1G port on MX204. admin@mx1> show configuration interfaces xe-0/1/4 description TEST; gigether-options { speed 1g; } unit 0 { family inet { address 192.168.1.138/30; } } admin@mx1> show configuration chassis fpc 0 pic 1 port 4 speed 10g;