Re: [j-nsp] BGP output queue priorities between RIBs/NLRIs

2020-11-09 Thread Rob Foehl
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020, Jeffrey Haas wrote: As the source of this particular bit of difficulty, a bit of explanation for why it simply wasn't done when the initial feature was authored. Much appreciated -- the explanation, anyway ;) An immense amount of work in the BGP code is built around the

Re: [j-nsp] arp bug workaround (mx204)

2020-11-09 Thread Baldur Norddahl
Den man. 9. nov. 2020 kl. 22.11 skrev Gert Doering : > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 08:55:11PM +0100, Baldur Norddahl wrote: > > So I am searching for work arounds. For example if I could make an ACL > that > > rewrites the vlans matching an IP address, such that the two IPs were on > > two

Re: [j-nsp] arp bug workaround (mx204)

2020-11-09 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 08:55:11PM +0100, Baldur Norddahl wrote: > So I am searching for work arounds. For example if I could make an ACL that > rewrites the vlans matching an IP address, such that the two IPs were on > two different VLANs, I could solve this by having two interfaces for the

Re: [j-nsp] BGP output queue priorities between RIBs/NLRIs

2020-11-09 Thread Jeffrey Haas via juniper-nsp
--- Begin Message --- > On Nov 9, 2020, at 12:19 PM, Rob Foehl wrote: > > [External Email. Be cautious of content] > > > On Mon, 27 Jul 2020, Rob Foehl wrote: > >> Anyone know the secret to getting BGP output queue priorities working across >> multiple NLRIs? > [...] >> I've tried about a

Re: [j-nsp] BGP output queue priorities between RIBs/NLRIs

2020-11-09 Thread Rob Foehl
On Mon, 27 Jul 2020, Rob Foehl wrote: Anyone know the secret to getting BGP output queue priorities working across multiple NLRIs? [...] I've tried about a dozen combinations of options, and cannot get any other result with inet/evpn routes in the same session -- inet.0 routes always arrive