Re: [j-nsp] RSVP path constraints for transit LSPs

2021-02-08 Thread Rob Foehl
On Sat, 6 Feb 2021, Robert Huey wrote: Have you looked into IGP Overload? I think it will do the trick without ever getting into TE constraints. In this case, it's OSPF, so overload is just max metric. The path metric already exceeds any other through the network under ordinary

Re: [j-nsp] RSVP path constraints for transit LSPs

2021-02-08 Thread aaron1
I know of a few methods for steering traffic in MPLS-TE/RSVP-TE, I've done this in IOS-XR, but not in Junos at this point... but i found this link that might help in Junos... https://www.inetzero.com/in-control-with-rsvp/ One way is to change the te-metric on that P router that you don't want

Re: [j-nsp] Does QinQ work with VPLS on Juniper300?

2021-02-08 Thread Benny Lyne Amorsen
Roger Wiklund writes: > That's interesting. According to this page QinQ is not supported on > SRX300/320, not sure if that has anything to do with it? Just a little comment in case someone else needs QinQ on small SRXs: Layer 3 termination of QinQ does work on SRX, even if VPLS does not. That