Re: [j-nsp] RSVP hidden routes in inet.0

The most annoying thing is that this is inet.0 table, not inet.3 Best regards, Misak Khachatryan, On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 7:30 PM Tom Beecher mailto:beec...@beecher.cc>> wrote: This is correct, they exist for the bypass LSPs. I wouldn't characterize it as a dirty hack though. RFC4090 fast

Re: [j-nsp] RSVP hidden routes in inet.0

This is correct, they exist for the bypass LSPs. I wouldn't characterize it as a dirty hack though. RFC4090 fast reroute requires the backup pathways to be pre-computed for a sub-10ms switchover. You put an export policy in place to make sure all labels (including bypass) are in the FIB already.

Re: [j-nsp] RSVP hidden routes in inet.0

Hi Misak, I think what you're seeing is normal for protection LSPs, "dirty hack on the control plane side", but I'm looking forward to be humbled on this list that my conclusion is incorrect. We use "ldp interface link-protection dynamic-rsvp-lsp" and for all my bypass LSPs, 'show route

[j-nsp] RSVP hidden routes in inet.0

Hello, Recently I implemented RSVP in my network, nothing so fancy - automesh and autobandwidth with node-link protection. By doing final review i saw output of show route summary: inet.0: 296 destinations, 298 routes (275 active, 0 holddown, 21 hidden) Direct: 6 routes,