Re: [j-nsp] mx304 alarm seen after junos upgrade

2024-02-29 Thread Aaron1 via juniper-nsp
Resolved… with the following… FPC showed a difference between what was running and what is available… reminiscent of IOS-XR upgrades and subsequent fpd/fpga upgrades. show system firmware FPC 0ZL30634 DPLL 9 6022.0.0 7006.0.0 OK request system

Re: [j-nsp] proxy-arp on EVPN irb

2023-12-06 Thread Aaron1 via juniper-nsp
As I recall, proxy-arp behavior is proven by looking in the local host arp cache and finding entries for foreign ip’s mapped to the default gateway’s mac address. If that is still occurring, then it would seem that proxy arp functionality is still working and you can move on to tshooting

Re: [j-nsp] QFX5110 / EVPN-VXLAN with IPv6 underlay

2023-11-28 Thread Aaron1 via juniper-nsp
…which is probably why you can configure it as “0” and Junos expands it to “0.0.0.0” Aaron > On Nov 28, 2023, at 10:07 AM, Christian Scholz via juniper-nsp > wrote: > > Also might be worth mentioning that the Router-ID - although it might look > like one and you would usually use one you

Re: [j-nsp] QSA adapters and MTU

2023-11-03 Thread Aaron1 via juniper-nsp
I recall the MX204 being like that… an XE interface with a 1g speed command on the interface Aaron > On Nov 3, 2023, at 11:00 AM, Olivier Benghozi via juniper-nsp > wrote: > > Actually 1G ports are «10G ports operating at 1G speed». > So, configured as 10G ports on chassis side, giga-ether

Re: [j-nsp] MX304 - Edge Router

2023-10-25 Thread Aaron1 via juniper-nsp
Years ago I had to get a license to make my 10g interfaces work on my MX104 Aaron > On Oct 25, 2023, at 5:03 AM, Tobias Heister via juniper-nsp > wrote: > > Am 25.10.2023 um 11:57 schrieb Xavier Beaudouin via juniper-nsp: >>> So there are a couple of enforced licenses even on MX ... and they

Re: [j-nsp] MX304 - Edge Router

2023-10-20 Thread Aaron1 via juniper-nsp
To reiterate and add to my previous email…also, please realize I’m in my early stages of learning about telemetry and Junos capabilities, so this is only what little I’ve seen and understand about it thus far… As a side note, the ACX7100-48L has been a challenge regarding telemetry as well,

Re: [j-nsp] MX304 - Edge Router

2023-10-18 Thread Aaron1 via juniper-nsp
Also saw this message too… Error related to jflow-specific reporting rate [edit services analytics] 'sensor my-sensor-21' reporting-rate can't be less than 30sec for Inline Jflow Sensor on mx304! error: configuration check-out failed Aaron > On Oct 18, 2023, at 8:48 AM, Aaron1 wrote: >

Re: [j-nsp] MX304 - Edge Router

2023-10-18 Thread Aaron1 via juniper-nsp
I have an MX304 in the lab, evaluating it at the moment. Junos: 22.2R3.15 Telemetry is running and a little different than what I have on my MX960’s Also, I get a license warning when committing OSPF and LDP. We got a license from our account team and now we don’t see that message anymore

Re: [j-nsp] ACX7100-48L

2023-06-13 Thread Aaron1 via juniper-nsp
Juniper is sending me a new one, thinking it’s a faulty unit. Aaron > On Jun 13, 2023, at 10:28 AM, Andrey Kostin wrote: > > Aaron Gould via juniper-nsp писал(а) 2023-06-12 11:22: > >> interestingly, the PR is said to be fixed in 22.2R2-EVO, wouldn't that >> follow that it should be fixed in