One of our latest deployments is based on VMware with EVPN-VXLAN for the
netwirking.
Amos
Sent from my iPhone
On 28 Oct 2017, at 22:20, Mehul gajjar
> wrote:
Hello there,
For knowledge purpose I want to know which hypervisor used when deployed
Hi,
We are utilizing FBF/PBR quite extensively mainly for redirecting traffic to
value added services platforms (caching, content filtering etc').
One nice feature in Junos is the ability to apply the filter on output
interfaces and avoiding loops using interface groups.
Of course it's not a
Hi Everybody,
We are working on a new DC design for a relatively large deployment (start at
20 racks and grow to about 60).
We are considering EVPN-VXLAN for extending L2 between rows (we failed
convincing the server guys that they don’t need this).
We are wondering if anyone has any
Hi Everybody,
We are working on a new DC design for a relatively large deployment (start at
20 racks and grow to about 60).
We are considering EVPN-VXLAN for extending L2 between rows (we failed
convincing the server guys that they don’t need this).
We are wondering if anyone has any
Dovid,
We just finished a project with 6 data centers, all with SRXs.
There was no downtime as we rebooted the secondary, then failed the cluster to
it and rebooted the primary.
Amos
Sent from my iPhone
On 22 Aug 2016, at 21:56, Dovid Bender
>
According to the recent rumors flying around, such a device should be on it's
way.
However, I've been hearing these rumors for quite some time.
Hopefully this week this should be clarified to me, but under NDA.
Regards,
Amos
Sent from my iPhone
On 2 May 2016, at 12:20, Harald F. Karlsen
Hi,
I am not very familiar with their portfolio but ALU seems to have decent
metro/agg boxes.
From a conversation with an Ericsson SE a few months ago they were suppose to
release a 1U platform with excellent port density.
Amos
Sent from my iPhone
On 30 Apr 2016, at 03:24, Colton Conor
I don't think ASR1K is comparable to MX.
The Juniper platform we position against ASR1K is the Juniper SRX.
Amos
Sent from my iPhone
On 30 Nov 2015, at 22:05, Mark Tinka
> wrote:
On 30/Nov/15 21:18, Nitzan Tzelniker wrote:
Regarding CGNAT
Hi,
We are in the final stages of testing EVPN for DCI as well as corporate
customers access into a small IaaS provider cloud.
So far the testing was really good.
Few points we encountered:
1. On single active multi homing, when the CE is a L2 switch. When failing the
active link the switch
Hello,
We use them as L2 core for a few small ISPs (port extension for MX80 routers).
The buffers of the EX4550 are not very good.
Especially when you go from 10g to 1g.
Amos
Sent from my iPhone
On 5 Jun 2015, at 08:59, Mark Tinka
mark.ti...@seacom.mumailto:mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote:
On
Hi,
What model of router are you using ?
What you are describing is a general problem of juniper routers, however it's
really bad on the low-mid range routers, MX5-80, the 104 is slightly better but
not very.
The stronger REs are less prone for this, although the real solution is a
serious
with it.
Clarke Morledge
College of William and Mary
On Thu, 14 Aug 2014, Amos Rosenboim wrote:
What model of router are you using ?
What you are describing is a general problem of juniper routers, however it's
really bad on
the low-mid range routers, MX5-80, the 104 is slightly better but not very
What I described only happens in convergence scenarios.
Amos
Sent from my iPhone
On 25 Sep 2013, at 02:21, Luca Salvatore
l...@ninefold.commailto:l...@ninefold.com wrote:
This concerns me a little. I'M about to take a full table on a MX5.
Is it only an issue when the adjacencyis lost and we
To add on Nitzan's comment(we work together):
When everything is stable all is good.
But bounce a full table BGP session, and than bounce an IGP adjacency and you
are in a lot of trouble.
This seems to be a combination of the (in)famous Junos software issue described
extensively by RAS and a
Hi,
Can you share some models that support DOM ?
All the compatibles that we have do not support it.
Thanks
Amos
Sent from my iPhone
On 15 May 2013, at 14:28, sth...@nethelp.nomailto:sth...@nethelp.no
sth...@nethelp.nomailto:sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
I have started collecting information
4550 packet buffers are not that big.
We are getting tail drops on ports that show 5-6 Gbps utilization (output of
monitor interface show command).
It's related to (micro)bursts, and there is not much to do about it. Deeper
buffers would certainly help.
If I remember correctly QFX uses a cut
We have deployed a mixed mode 4500/4200 small VC as a part of mobile network
core and it is running smoothly so far.
We don't have significant throughput, and we don't run any fancy features.
It's simply serves as L2 port extension for MX routers.
We have also tried to deploy mixed mode between
Hi All,
We are trying to implement iBGP multipath.
R1 receives route 2.2.2.2 from R2 with NH=1.1.1.1
1.1.1.1 is an iBGP route learned through 2 iBGP peers (all attributes are
equal).
For 1.1.1.1 we can see two next-hops at both the RIB and FIB.
For 2.2.2.2 only 1 next hop is installed at both
Hello Phil,
I have seen this happen a few times and with different platforms.
A good way to avoid this is to configure policing on the OOB switches ports
facing the REs.
Regards
Amos
Sent from my iPhone
On 22 Jun 2012, at 15:16, Phil Mayers
Hi,
It seems there is a common agreement that 10.4R8 is not the release to Ho with.
Now I feel left out of the party, as I have no idea what you folks are talking
about.
I am also feeling a little nervous, as we are in the staging phase of a 12
router network and they are all running 10.4R8.
Hi All,
I have a router with two VRFs.
I need to apply FBF on traffic flowing between the two VRFs so I created a
logical tunnel that connects the two VRFs.
The problem is that when importing routes from one VRF to the other the next
hop is obviously not through the tunnel.
I am trying to apply
Hello All,
I'm planning a greenfield IP/MPLS network for a mobile operator.
The requirements are to support MPLS services (mainly L3 VPNs but also some
VPLS), enforce strict but fairly simple CoS model, and support fast
convergence.
No requirement for CSPF based TE.
Traditionally I'de set
sub-50ms convergence. For paths that weren't covered by LFA in a worst case
scenario, I got about 300ms. Not too bad. Junos seems really fast at converging
even without LFA. We use MX960s and MX80s.
I hope this helps.
Serge
From: Amos Rosenboim a...@oasis
Hi Paul,
The Junos DHCPv6 implementation does not support DHCPv6 IA requests as sent by
users. It supports DHCPv6 PD (prefix delegation) for allocating prefixes to
downstream routers.
However you don't really need DHCPv6 to assign users with IP addresses. All you
need to do enable router
Hello All,
Not exactly a Juniper specific question, but knowing the list is very SP
oriented I'm thinking it's still worth while.
Does anyone have an idea about SPs that are supporting flowspec with peers and
customers ?
Regards
Amos
___
As far as I remember deactivating the interface will not take the link down, so
we are relying on igp hold times to detect the failure.
If so, does the 45 seconds make any sense ?
Can you correlate igp adjacency loss to lsp switchover to customer pings ?
Amos
Sent from my iPhone
On 14 Mar
When you create a community with two values inside square brackets it's an and
operation.
When specify multiple community names in a policy it's an or operation.
Regards
Amos
On Feb 17, 2011, at 10:31 PM, Ido Szargel wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to find a way to match 2 communities on a
Hello all,
This morning one of our MX routers stopped responding to SNMP if-mib queries.
It responds nicely to other SNMP queries.
The SNMP responses simply arrive empty.
Restarting SNMP does not help.
We are running 10.2R3.
Is anyone aware of this issue and is there any workaround or is a
If the network is Juniper end to end you can evaluate flow spec.
Regards,
Amos
Sent from my iPhone
On 31 Jan 2011, at 19:17, Walaa Abdel razzak wala...@bmc.com.sa wrote:
Hi Experts
I need to implement a QoS based on AS number match. I couldn't match on
subnets as it's not fixed
wrote:
IMHO, it has almost no sense in case of PPP
2011/1/10 Bjørn Mork bj...@mork.no:
Amos Rosenboim a...@oasis-tech.net writes:
ipv6 nd prefix-advertisement 2a02:ed0:1002:1::/64 3600 3000 autoconfig
You may want to add onlink here
Bjørn
--
Best regards,
Egor Zimin
with Juniper IPv6oPPPoE on E-series.
Can you please show me show configuration of your BRAS ?
I have encountered a similar problem. In my case root cause was
validLifetime=0 in RA messages. Like this:
---
ipv6 nd prefix-advertisement 2001:db8::/64 0 0 autoconfig
---
2010/12/31 Amos
Hello Everybody and happy new year,
I'm managing the network of a small ISP and working on adding IPv6 to the
network.
Subscribers connect to the ISP services by either PPPoE or L2TP dialers.
On the ISP side the edge router (Juniper E310 BRAS) is configured with local
DHCP pool out of which a
Hello,
I would like to enable IPv6 for subscribers connecting (PPPoL2TP) to our ERX310
(running 10.1.1).
I decided to use IPv6 local pool, the pool is configured and enabled service
dhcpv6-local.
What do I need to configure so the router will start assigning IPv6 prefixes to
the subscribers?
I
We had a the exact same thing on the lower end SRX (240 if I remember
correctly).
This was resolved by a software upgrade to the latest SRX image at the time.
Amos
On Aug 2, 2010, at 2:48 PM, Fahad Khan wrote:
Hi folks,
I am seeing very strange issue on SRX3600 when the traffic is flown
As far as I know the code you are running is the recommended version by Juniper.
However it's important to mention that I have no experience with the high end
SRX boxes.
The stuff mentioned below by quoc sounds a little scary to me.
Amos
Sent from my iPhone
On 2 Aug 2010, at 23:44, Fahad Khan
Hello All,
I'm trying to configure an inter provider LDP based L2VPN between a
Juniper network and a Cisco network.
The topology is roughly as follows:
Cisco PE-Cisco P--Cisco P--Cisco ASBR--Juniper
ASBR---Juniper P---Juniper P---Juniper PE.
In order to
Chris,
Thanks for your feedback.
However I think it does not address the following points:
1. Memory consumption increased by flow mode even if the router
reverts to packet mode the pre allocation is not released.
2. Upgrade from packet mode version to flow mode version locks you out
of the
Chris,
The discussion is about J series routers, not SRXs.
The J series are marketed as routers not security devices and turning
them to security devices all of a sudden is a decision I still don't
understand.
If you want to open a discussion about SRX we can do that.
I have no experience
Hello List,
I'm looking for an intelligent way to manage IP pools on ERX.
Currently we are using statically configured pools to assign IPs to
PPP customers, which is of course inefficient.
The documentation I could find was about downloading access routes
from radius server, but I don't
Marlon,
It wasn't explicitly stated below so just to clarify.
A firewall filter applied to the lo0.0 interface is applied to all
control plane traffic handled by the RE no matter what the
destination address on the router is (i.e it also applied to the ip
address assigned to the interfaces
Hello All,
I'm planning to to deploy J-2320 routers in a hosting farm facing two
ISPs.
I would like to receive full internet routing table from both ISPs.
in terms of forwarding capacity they seem to have more what I need,
but when looking at the number of BGP routes they seem to be limited
Hello,
We have deployed several of these switches (EX-3200) in a small
service provider network to connect few servers and also as
aggregation layer between our access and core layers.
So far our experience is very good, although we did not try too much
fancy stuff.
We are doing L2
,
Truman
On 22/12/2008, at 11:41 AM, Amos Rosenboim wrote:
Hello List,
We are using an ERX 310 as an LNS (Junos-E Version: 9.0.0
release-0.0 [BuildId 8976]).
We have few virtual routers which are used for some sub-providers
(virtual ISPs).
We are able to use SNMP and poll the total number
Hello List,
We are using an ERX 310 as an LNS (Junos-E Version: 9.0.0 release-0.0
[BuildId 8976]).
We have few virtual routers which are used for some sub-providers
(virtual ISPs).
We are able to use SNMP and poll the total number of sessions, but
cannot find the oid for polling per
Hello List,
I'm looking for the JunosE equivalent of lo0 filters in Junos or
Cisco control plane policing.
Any reference will be welcome.
Regards
Amos
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hello List,
I'm wondering whether flow-spec can be used in order to change the
next hop for some flows.
Can anyone provide any sample configuration of flow-spec policies, or
refer me to the documentation?
Regards
Amos Rosenboim
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello List,
I'm looking to monitor ERX310 using Cacti.
Does anyone have Cacti templates that he is willing to share for this
platform?
Also templates for J-series will be highly appreciated.
Regards
Amos Rosenboim
[EMAIL PROTECTED
it's right, but I really don't think it
creates such a big problem.
Amos Rosenboim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sep 10, 2008, at 3:08 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 07:31:37 Kevin Hodle wrote:
I agree, this is 'hotly debated' :).. Those who argue
against having transfer
this?
Regards
Amos Rosenboim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sep 6, 2008, at 12:46 AM, Dan Armstrong wrote:
EUREKA you're a genius!
Thanks... That works perfectly.
And thanks to all who replied!
Kevin Hodle wrote:
Hi Dan,
Instead of 'from external' you need 'from route-type external',
like so
Hello James,
Can you explain the logic behind Cogent BGP topology?
Are they going through all these configuration efforts just so their
PE routers will not have to carry full internet feed?
Regards
Amos Rosenboim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 20, 2008, at 11:21 PM, James Jun wrote:
Hi, I'm
There you go.
Configuration and logs
Thanks in advance,
Amos Rosenboim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Aug 14, 2008, at 5:55 AM, Truman Boyes wrote:
Amos,
Possibly you can post a snippet of the logs from the ERX, and we
can take a look.
Regards,
Truman
On 13/08/2008, at 1:41 PM, Amos
the radius (framed-ip-
address=100.100.100.1) then the user is unable to connect.
Any Idea if I'm missing some configuration to allow allocation of IPs
from the radius?
10x
Amos Rosenboim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp
Hello Chris,
If I remember correctly then B3 errors are associated with clocking
alignment along the circuit.
This also correlate to what you are saying about passing through 7
carriers.
Regards
Amos Rosenboim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 4, 2008, at 9:54 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
I have
.
Regards
Amos Rosenboim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jul 23, 2008, at 5:00 PM, Leigh Porter wrote:
I would also like to do this but does anybody know if the per-flow
load
balancing will correctly distribute multiple GRE sessions between the
same pair of IP addresses fairly across the two paths
. I heard that newer versions of
IOS contain enhancements to the BGP processing that might improve the
situation, but I have not tested it myself.
Regards
Amos Rosenboim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jul 6, 2008, at 6:55 AM, Kris Price wrote:
Hi,
We're looking at both the MX and 7600 platforms
Of Amos
Rosenboim
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 9:56 AM
To: juniper-nsp
Subject: [j-nsp] BGP question
Hello List,
This is not Juniper specific, but I think it's an interesting case
anyway.
A global carrier is running an MPLS network to provide L3 and L2
vpns. Obviously this carrier doesn't have
I actually used the MRV thingy for doing just that and it worked very
well.
It's actually a nice CWDM system.
Regards
Amos
On May 22, 2008, at 6:05 PM, Matthew Crocker wrote:
Doesn't MRV sell a CDWM 'thingy' that will take two GigE links and
combine them onto a single 2.5 gb Lambda? You
the 4 switches option is preferred if the budget allows it.
Amos
On Apr 19, 2008, at 7:56 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Amos Rosenboim:
Regarding the number of boxes, you can consolidate the 4 switches to
just two by using vlans.
Huh? You either lose redundancy, or you heavily rely on VLAN
Hello,
Regarding the number of boxes, you can consolidate the 4 switches to
just two by using vlans.
I would use ospf for managing the failover with the external routers
and keep VRRP for the static elements (servers I guess) inside.
I'm not very familiar with the stateful filters feature of
Hello List,
I have a customer with both SSG550 as the corporate firewall, as well
as IDP.
The customer would like to block access to the go2mypc service.
The challenge is that go2mypc is simply an outbound SSL connection,
and of course the customer does not want to block all outbound SSL.
Hi List,
This reminds me:
Is it possible to have different match type for each different line
in the prefix-list (similar to the Cisco implementation)?
Amos
On Feb 7, 2008, at 2:33 PM, Samuel wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
Regarding the default behavior in firewall filters, there is no way
you can
Since you are using LDP, which (at least for me) means that you don't
have any MPLS traffic engineering in the network, then LDP LSP
follows the IGP path.
This means that a simple trace route can show you the path between
the edge routers.
Cheers,
Amos
On Jan 28, 2008, at 3:25 PM,
Hello,
I do have some experience with the SSG series (running ScreenOS). I
like those devices very much, although I did not use them in
transparent mode, and did not get near the performance you expect.
They do have a feature (licensed one) called deep inspection, which
is sort of IDP/IPS
Hello,
How do you get those BGP routes that you are trying to export?
Are they being sent when there is no policy at all?
Regards
Amos
On Jul 1, 2007, at 7:41 AM, Stephen Fulton wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having an issue exporting routes to iBGP peers. I am able to
import
routes from my iBGP
You can use clear ip ospf database, or clear a specific neighbor with
clear ip ospf nei A.B.C.D
Regards
Amos
On May 29, 2007, at 11:51 AM, nsp wrote:
Hi,
anyone know the command to restart ospf on erx?
Similar to restart routing immediately but on junose (its ok to
restart
the whole
Dan,
Without giving it too much thought, maybe bgp confederations might
become handy in your case.
Regards
Amos
On May 16, 2007, at 4:13 PM, Dan Benson wrote:
Alan and all, I am currently tracking IGP metrics in LDP. Please
see my
show route proto bgp detail below. I have changed my
causing any harm.
-Original Message-
From: Amos Rosenboim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 9:25 PM
To: Harry Reynolds
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] layer 3 vpn issue
Hello Harry,
Thanks for your advice, and sorry it took me so long
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Amos Rosenboim
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 8:18 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] layer 3 vpn issue
Hi
I have configured an network of 4 M10i routers for mpls using
RSVP for label distribution.
the topology is as follows:
R1E3 lineR2
Hi
I have configured an network of 4 M10i routers for mpls using RSVP
for label distribution.
the topology is as follows:
R1E3 lineR2EthernetR3-3xE1R4
I have configured a test VRF on all 4 routers and associated a
loopback unit in each router to the test VRF.
I have
69 matches
Mail list logo