[j-nsp] L3VPN between Cisco and Juniper

All, What are the factor to consider for implementing L3VPN between Cisco and Juniper? Any documentation that someone can share with me? -- David W. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

[j-nsp] MVPN Rosen interoperation configuration Cisco and Juniper

Can someone please share the working Rosen MVPN configuration of Cisco and Juniper? Do I have to use vrf-table-label or VT interface on Juniper router to make it working? -- David W. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

[j-nsp] L2VPN/170/-101

sometime I see the L2VPN/170/-101 in route table, trying to understand what is -101 is indicating? -- David W. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] P2MP LSP

All, I have been trying to understand the P2MP LSP signalling and establishment. I have few question about it: How the ingress node knows about all the egress Node? BGP? Any good document or link? Now ingress node knows about the egress node then tunnel will be singaled using the RSVP so there

Re: [j-nsp] P2MP LSP

LSPs are totally dynamic. David W. On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Mark Tinka mti...@globaltransit.netwrote: On Tuesday 29 June 2010 11:43:49 pm David water wrote: How the ingress node knows about all the egress Node? BGP? Yes, the MCAST-VPN address family ('inet-mvpn' in JUNOS

Re: [j-nsp] VPLS label allocation

Now, how the label base, offset is calculated, we can configure the site id so how does the router calculate the other values? On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Phill Jolliffe ph...@twine-networks.comwrote: Need to be careful when describing the formula. local/remote site id means varies

[j-nsp] L2VPN Site id confusion

In L2VPN BGP based we need the unique site id for each and every connected CE device on PE router as label will be calculated on the based of it. But I am bit confuse with the remote site id configuration, is it used in cross connect or how does it work with L2VPNS? To calculate outgoing inner

[j-nsp] VPLS label allocation

Can some one point me to the easy calculation document for RFC4761 label allocation technique? its very confusing. To my understanding site-offset + label-range should cover the remote site id So if remote site id is 30 then site-offset should be 24 and range should be 8 which covers the range

[j-nsp] IBGP in RR

All, In case of redundant RR, how the IBGP session will be build between RR: under cluster configuration or under IBGP group configuration? Both RR is part of same cluster. In any way the clients will have IBGP session to both RR and RR will ignore the routes received from each other because of

[j-nsp] rip-in

On Page 216 of JNCIP book, they have used the RIP import policy rip-in so it is used to only accept the RIP routes on that router to avoid loop? But that we can achieve by writing export policy in OSPF too? only match RIP routes and advertise it in OSPF rather than writing rip-in policy. --

Re: [j-nsp] local summary route advertisement in JNCIP BOOK EBGP Export policy

Chris, Its Page 529. -- David W. On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Chris Grundemann cgrundem...@gmail.comwrote: What pages in the study guide are you looking at? ~Chris My Android sent this message. On May 8, 2010 9:21 PM, David water dwater2...@gmail.com wrote: All, I was reading EBGP

[j-nsp] local summary route advertisement in JNCIP BOOK EBGP Export policy

All, I was reading EBGP policy from JNCIP book and came across advertisement of local subnet summary to EBGP peer where you have IGP area where you are only receiving default. That part looks tricky. Can some one explain it to make it little easy? -- David W.

[j-nsp] policy from JNCIP book

Hi, I am trying to understand the policy in BGP, in JNCIP book we have following policy with term 1 to 3. Term 1 and 2 is rejecting all unwanted routes and term 3 is matching those are originating in C1 and reference to the next policy. So here next policy will be next term (term4) if so then it

Re: [j-nsp] policy from JNCIP book

policy means the default BGP policy which by default accepts all BGP routes that pass sanity checks. Vladi Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device -Original Message- From: David water dwater2...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 08:31:22 To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j

[j-nsp] RR in JUNOS

To configure RR and Client on JUNOS, Do I have to configure two IBGP group? one for RR to peer full mesh of IBGP in case of redundant RR scenario and other group for Client? If so then let say I have static router on router and I want to advertise it in IBGP then which group do I need to advertise

[j-nsp] VRRP in logical router

Hi, I have router with two ge ports connected back to back and I am trying to figure out how can I crate the three router topology in same subnet to simulate VRRP sceanrio, any idea or hint how to do that? -- David W. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list

[j-nsp] rib group

All, How does rib-group work in JUNOS? How does the import and export works using rib-groups? -- David W. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] erase configuration

What is equivalent of wire erase in JUNOS? -- David W. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] any guidance on JNCIP-M

How to prepare for JNCIP M exam? -- David W. ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] VRRP on logical router using LT interface

Hi All, Is it even possible to create the VRRP topology using logical router and LT interface? Can I put Logical router R1/R2/R3 in one subnet using LT interface to test the VRRP configuration? If yes then can someone share the test configuration? -- David W.