[j-nsp] QFX tag stacking help please

I have a 5110 18.1R3-S6.1 facing a trunk with a vlan coming with stacked. Xe-0/0/46 comes in on 1079 with inner 776, 777. I'm having a heck of a time figuring out the proper mapping to make this work. Different docs don't seem to line up with available commands so I've been getting nowhere

Re: [j-nsp] MX204 port 1G

One of many working 204s with 1G. Model: mx204 Junos: 18.2R3-S1.7 Chassis: PIC 1 BUILTIN BUILTIN 8XSFPP PIC Xcvr 0 @(+ NON-JNPR F179CO14506 SFP-LX10 Xcvr 1NON-JNPR F179CO14505 SFP-LX10 Xcvr 2 Et

Re: [j-nsp] MX routers and DAC cables?

That's what I was going to chime in on. Behaviour differences between software versions have done different defaults. ekrichbaum@atl-bdr1> show interfaces et-0/0/1 | grep FEC Active defects : None Ethernet FEC Mode : NONE eric@cht-bdr2> show interfaces et-0/0/1

Re: [j-nsp] 100G DAC issue between MX204 and QFX5110

I tried 17.3 and 17.2 based on a PR, but let me try 17.4. Can't hurt. So far none of the 4 versions have done anything for me. -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp On Behalf Of Tim Jackson Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2019 8:48 AM To: Saku Ytti Cc: Juniper List Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 100G

[j-nsp] 100G DAC issue between MX204 and QFX5110

Has anyone gotten the Fiberstore 100G DAC to link up between a QFX and an MX? I got link between 2 MX using it without any issue but haven't had any luck to the QFX. They detect ok: Xcvr 48 REV 01 740-061001 C1905258091 QSFP28-100G-CU1M Xcvr 49 REV 01 740-061001

Re: [j-nsp] QSFP28 oddities between Arista and QFX after upgrade

I had a similar issue with 18.x and MX204. Did you try turning off auto-negotiation? set interfaces et-4/0/52 ether-options no-auto-negotiation I had a similar issue with QFX5100/EX4300 and 40G and this fixed the issue oddly enough. Eric -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp On

Re: [j-nsp] Silly command?

I like them. 100G FS DAC between a pair works well in 17, not so much in 18 code (although I didn't try disabling auto negotiation, which is a quirk with the 4300/5100 sometimes). I gave up early on about not hard setting the interfaces. Never worked for me until I did that. BGP did as

Re: [j-nsp] qfx5120-48y-8c - jtac recommeded junos version

You'll have to let us know how well they work. I heard no vc stacking until v19 code or so. Also wondering about 18 level code. Just took a set of 5100s to 17.3 with good results. -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp On Behalf Of Aaron Gould Sent: Friday, December 21, 2018 10:34 AM To:

Re: [j-nsp] MX204

3x 40G + 8x 10G -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp On Behalf Of Mark Tinka Sent: Monday, May 14, 2018 6:20 PM To: Tim Jackson ; Bill Blackford Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX204

Re: [j-nsp] MX204

I tried the knobs in the kb as well with no luck. Never got the 40G port to detect as 40. Just split 10s. trying to 40 on 2 ports to a QFX virt chassis. Eric -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp On Behalf Of Nathan Ward Sent: Monday, May 14,

[j-nsp] next-hop driving me crazy

This should be simple but I can't get the behavior I want. Blackhole scenario. Customer set community, I want to see that community and set next-hop to an address I have with a discard. I've tried both a discard interface and a basic static route. Those seem ok either way. set routing-options

Re: [j-nsp] next-hop driving me crazy

extensive? Thanks. Tim On 26-04-13 15:36, Eric Krichbaum wrote: This should be simple but I can't get the behavior I want. Blackhole scenario. Customer set community, I want to see that community and set next-hop to an address I have with a discard. I've tried both a discard interface

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

That's correct but in this case one is LACP (802.3ad) and one is not so it won't bring up the links at all. Eric From: snort bsd [mailto:snort...@yahoo.com.au] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 9:17 AM To: Jonathan Lassoff; Eric Krichbaum Cc: juniper-nsp Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

[mailto:snort...@yahoo.com.au] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 9:12 AM To: Eric Krichbaum; 'Jonathan Lassoff' Cc: 'juniper-nsp' Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200 well, i deliberately not to activate lacp at this moment. just want to see physical links up... _dave _ From: Eric

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

More likely, it's the forced on mode which disables LACP. Try it with mode active. -Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jonathan Lassoff Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 8:34 PM To: snort bsd Cc: juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200

-Original Message- From: Jonathan Lassoff [mailto:j...@thejof.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 9:16 PM To: Eric Krichbaum Cc: snort bsd; juniper-nsp Subject: Re: [j-nsp] 3750 and 4200 On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Eric Krichbaum e...@telic.us wrote: More likely, it's the forced