Re: [j-nsp] IPAM like tool/DB for managing communities

Hello there, Same issue with PHPIPAM. RDs are the unique identifier and always mapping towards the VRF name. You can add custom fields to VRFs where you can place your RTs. If you are running a unique RD per PE the VRF is configured in then the RD is not that important anyway it’s the RTs

Re: [j-nsp] "set routing-options protect core" breaks local-preference

Hello. One question reagrding this and Junipers offerings in the virtual appliance field. Even though I agree with the statement, when looking at Ciscos offering in virtual appliances for lab and testing purposes I find that a lot of the functionality isn't there especially when we are

Re: [j-nsp] Segment Routing Real World Deployment (was: VPC mc-lag)

Hello James. Interesting feedback, thank you. //Gustav -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: juniper-nsp För James Bensley Skickat: den 5 juli 2018 10:15 Till: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Ämne: Re: [j-nsp] Segment Routing Real World Deployment (was: VPC mc-lag) On 4 July 2018 at 18:13, Mark

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

of commitment to ones customers. To be honest perhaps Juniper shouldn’t have added VRF support on the 2200s at all and just point to 3300s or SRX line. //Gustav Från: Pavel Lunin [mailto:plu...@gmail.com] Skickat: den 20 september 2017 21:31 Till: Gustav Ulander <gustav.ulan...@telecomputing.se>

Re: [j-nsp] Moving onto EX2300

Yea lets make the customers job harder partly by not supporting old features in the next incarnation of the platform (think VRF support) . Also lets not make them work the same so that the customer must relearn how to configure them. Excellent way of actually pushing the customer to also look

Re: [j-nsp] MX104 capabilities question

Well not really but its a rather new platform. Give it 6-12 months to mature and perhaps it will actually work. ;) //Gustav -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Aaron [mailto:aar...@gvtc.com] Skickat: den 9 juni 2016 16:45 Till: Gustav Ulander <gustav.ulan...@telecomputing.se>; 'Mark

Re: [j-nsp] MX104 capabilities question

I would think that the 7280R is more a competitor to ACX5k and NCS 5k boxes? But would be really interested to see where the MPLS feature set is in maturity as Mark says. All three boxes should be really handy to have for P dutys when doing no or very little BGP on them except the Arista one

Re: [j-nsp] SLAX/Curl is html-entity-encoding content

Yepp thats the plan. We are looking at london LD 5 as discussed earlier. We will probably start that project in Q2 or Q3. Otherwise we are loosly discussing what can be done for our Singapore office but that's there we don't have any real plans. //gustav -Original Message- From: