Re: [j-nsp] "set protocols evpn encapsulation vxlan" is missing in ACX7100

> On 25/10/2022, at 22:21, niklas rehnberg via juniper-nsp > wrote: > > Hi all, > I am evaluating the AC7100 (Junos: 22.3R1.9-EVO) as a central GW in a VXLAN > solution. > In other juniper platforms, the following command is needed to turn on vni: > "set protocols evpn encapsulation switch" >

Re: [j-nsp] Subscriber management / dual stacked VLAN / DHCP help

Hi, So, firstly, you shouldn’t need to do IP demux (i.e. demux0 etc.) - as your users appear to be on different VLANs. IP demux is for situations where you have a single VLAN with multiple subscribers - but in your case you want “VLAN demux”. The Juniper docs and examples are unfortunately not

Re: [j-nsp] Advertising inactive routes to iBGP neighbors

> > On 18/04/2022, at 3:49 AM, James via juniper-nsp > wrote: > > > From: James mailto:ja...@nexril.net>> > Subject: Advertising inactive routes to iBGP neighbors > Date: 18 April 2022 at 3:49:44 AM NZST > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] FlowSpec rules being installed, but not matching any traffic

--- Begin Message --- > On 14/04/2022, at 10:53 PM, Tobias Heister via juniper-nsp > wrote: > > Hi, > > I doubt that BGP Flow Spec is systested or supported on any QFX5k platform. > > Feature Explorer (while not perfect :)) does support me in that thinking: >

Re: [j-nsp] EVPN IRB / gateway selection

> On 23/02/2020, at 11:38 PM, Roger Wiklund wrote: > > Hi Nathan > > You're not missing anything. EVPN Overlay IRB VGA selection does NOT take > underlay metrics into consideration yet (it's on the roadmap) Hi Roger, I don’t suppose you have a view on that roadmap? Would be a helpful thing

[j-nsp] EVPN vrf-export + vrf-import

Hi, I’m doing some testing of an environment using EVPN pure type 5 routes in a VRF, with EVPN-VXLAN, on MX and QFX5120. I am trying to do some “asymmetric" import+export - to do like we did in L3VPN and build a “hub and spoke” VPN. Specific use case is a common “services” VRF, which has

Re: [j-nsp] MX/MPC maximum routes

> On 22/10/2021, at 12:44 PM, Dario Amaya via juniper-nsp > wrote: > > Hello, > > We using the following hardware: > > CHAS-BP-MX480-S > SCBE-MX-S > RE-S-1800X4-16G-S > MPC-3D-16XGE-SFPP > MX-MPC2E-3D > > This router is carrying full IPv4 and IPv6 table with current routes > count at 846528

Re: [j-nsp] DHCP server recommendation for subscribers management

> On 11/08/2021, at 8:44 AM, Andrey Kostin wrote: > > Nathan Ward via juniper-nsp писал 2021-08-10 08:00: >>> On 10/08/2021, at 10:40 PM, Bjørn Mork via juniper-nsp >>> wrote: > > Thank you Nathan and Bjorn for your explanations, they are very helpful!

Re: [j-nsp] DHCP server recommendation for subscribers management

> On 10/08/2021, at 10:40 PM, Bjørn Mork via juniper-nsp > wrote: > >>> In any case, you can do that with a sufficiently smart RADIUS server >>> too. You don't have to let JUNOS manage the address pools even if >>> it is >>> providing the DHCP frontend. >> >> I understand that it could be an

Re: [j-nsp] MX VRRP on VXLAN enviroment

Hi, > On 20/07/2021, at 12:23 AM, Cristian Cardoso via juniper-nsp > wrote: > > I have a scenario here where I use EVPN-VXLAN with qfx5120 switches > and until then I was using the gateways on the switches, but as the > switch does not have the possibility to use any kind of firewall on > the