Hi Paul,
We've faced the same problem in the past and we created a firewall filter which
does what you want:
{master:0}[edit firewall family ethernet-switching filter BPDU_FILTER]
term 1 {
from {
destination-mac-address {
01:80:c2:00:00:00;
}
}
then {
Hi All,
We sometimes have STP toplogy changes and I would like to have some kind of
notification for this.
I've already tried doing this with SNMP traps and syslog, but both options
didnt work. It can be logged to a file via ethernet-switching-options
trace-options; it shows up in the logs
...@comlinx.com.au]
Sent: dinsdag 5 januari 2010 14:39
To: Niels Ardts
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper EX - Notification on STP topology change?
Hi Niels
We sometimes have STP toplogy changes and I would like to have some kind of
notification for this.
I've already
Hi,
Actually, we have this working on 9.5R2.7... :)
You need to do the following:
Under ethernet-switching-options:
dot1q-tunneling {
ether-type 0x8100;
}
And then create the QinQ vlan:
{master:1}[edit vlans QinQvlan]
vlan-id 504;
interface {
ge-1/0/8.0; -- customer interface
Until now we've always used a seperate vrrp groupid for each vlan.
But after reading this message I decided to give it a try, since I totally
agree that it adds some complexity.
If I understand the post correct something like this should work:
n...@xx# show
vlan-id 241;
family inet {
No, it is a different virtual address and also a completely different subnet!
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Jonathan Brashear [mailto:jonathan.brash...@hq.speakeasy.net]
Verzonden: vrijdag 30 oktober 2009 17:11
Aan: Niels Ardts; 'Terry Baranski'; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Onderwerp: RE
Ah, yes that makes sense! Thanks for your explanation.
-Niels
Op 30 okt 2009 om 17:44 heeft Terry Baranski tbaran...@mail.com
het volgende geschreven:\
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 11:02AM, Niels Ardts wrote:
However, an error is returned:
edit interfaces ae1 unit 241 family inet address yy
I can remember we've had such an issue on 9.3R2, but at the end that
turned out to be an hardware issue on one of the members of the VC.
We're running 9.5R2.7 for about 6 weeks now and did not observe any
issues anymore. The switches are used for 'simple' L2 forwarding with
MSTP, no L3.
We have
8 matches
Mail list logo
