Re: [j-nsp] MX304 Port Layout

Hi, > On 26 Jun 2023, at 20:56, Jackson, William via juniper-nsp > wrote: > >> The MX204 is an MPC7E, so whatever H-QoS is on the MPC7E is what the >> MX204 will also do. > >> We have used them as an edge router on a temporary basis at new sites, >> with an Arista switch hanging off of them

Re: [j-nsp] VMX integrated FPC

Hi, I remember when I originally got my mittens on VMX there was a boot > flag to tell it to use an integrated FPC or integrated RIOT without a > separate VM running forwarding. I can't find my notes on that. > > Does anyone know if that's still possible? I just want a pretend/low >

Re: [j-nsp] Managing MX480 fxp0

Hi, > I would personally not wire or use fxp0 unless I'm out of options. > Some other vendors today have real out-of-band ethernet for MGMT, > meaning own CPU, own memory, own OS not fate-sharing the > control-plane, which is the correct solution for OOB, but not > something we as a community are

[j-nsp] MX10003 rack size

Hi, Has anyone ever managed to fit a Juniper MX10003 in a 90cm deep rack? Without applying power tools to either the rack or the router ;) Cheers, Sander signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP ___ juniper-nsp mailing list

Re: [j-nsp] IPv6 firewall policy for MX

Hi, > Is there a good online resource for IPv6 firewall policy/hardening for MX > series routers? I would start with the IPv6 filter example starting on page 336 of Juniper MX Series, 2nd Edition (ISBN: 978-1-4919-3272-8). There are eBook versions available, and o'Reilly Safari gives you

Re: [j-nsp] BFD for IPv6 in Hardware

Hi Mark, > Some good news from my friendly SE... the ER to add support per subject > has been filed. > > Timelines on when we shall see code are forthcoming. Good news! Sander signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP ___ juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] fusion QFX5120 and MX204

Hi, > Am 12.04.2019 um 22:10 schrieb Aaron Gould: >> Trying to do fusion from MX204 (AD) to QFX5120-48Y-8C (SD). but getting this >> message.. "Satellite image not available" >> Is a QFX5120-48Y-8C capable of being a satellite device in fusion ? > > Not yet. >

Re: [j-nsp] Old JunOS upgrade path

Hi, > On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 01:17:44PM -0700, Eldon Koyle wrote: >> Many (most?) network operating systems are an image file that the >> switch either writes over a partition (ie. block-level copy) or boots >> directly (ie. initrd/initramfs) with a separate partition for a config >> file.

Re: [j-nsp] DNS Flag Day

Hi Melchior, > Thanks for pointing this out. Please have a look at > https://prsearch.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=prcontent=PR1379433 and > let me know your ideas. Yep, that sounds exactly like what's happening! "Resolved In 15.1X49-D160 17.4R3 18.1R3 18.2R2 18.3R1 18.4R1" sounds

[j-nsp] DNS Flag Day

Hi, When doing some investigation for the upcoming DNS Flag Day (https://dnsflagday.net: February 1st 2019) I got some bad news from one of the service providers: they use Juniper SRX firewalls, and claim that they can't properly support EDNS because of a bug in their SRX firewalls. This seems

Re: [j-nsp] [c-nsp] RFC5837

Hi, > I somewhat recently discovered https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5837 > > Exec summary: your traceroute will show the ingress ifindex where > packet came in, allowing you to discriminate LAG/bundle/ae interfaces > and determine actual path in network with ease. > > It seems like massively

Re: [j-nsp] router reflector clients and non-clients

Hi Adam, > Op 30 mei 2018, om 10:56 heeft adamv0...@netconsultings.com het volgende > geschreven: > >> Of Sander Steffann >> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 9:36 AM >> >> Hi, >> >>> But in this scenario, a client will send an update both to R

Re: [j-nsp] Ansible juniper_junos -add license module?

Hi, > The "xml-name" statement gives the name of the RPC used to access > this command, which means the RPC adds a > license from either a URL or a string, and the > exports license data to a URL. I tried that, and git an error message back saying eta the license-add command is only