Re: [j-nsp] destination nat, 8 rule limit

he said he did that already.. unfortunately i don't think the limits were upped for source/destination nat rules, i think it is still 8 on 9.6r1 On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:39 AM, Derick Winkworth dwinkwo...@att.net wrote: Upgrade to 9.6. You can have many more rules per rule-set...

Re: [j-nsp] [c-nsp] Network Liberation Movement???

On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Omachonu Ogali oog...@gmail.com wrote: How much is buzz worth? About the same as YouTube views. (In South Park speak, theoretical dollars). If you can't convert *positive* buzz into revenue, your marketing efforts will serve as nothing more than brand

Re: [j-nsp] [c-nsp] Network Liberation Movement???

looks as if its working based on the activity in this thread... ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

[j-nsp] Refurbished Hardware

anyone know of a reputable reseller where I may be able to find an SCB for an old M40 chassis? christian ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] Inactive/Disabled Interface Reporting Link Down via SNMP

thanks to all that replied activating the interface, deleting the disable, then re-adding the disable, seemed to fix my issue christian On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Christian Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi - I have an interface on an old M40, which i have 'deactivated', 'set

Re: [j-nsp] vpls ping control-plane-response

read the following kompella draft, i am pretty sure vpls ping operation is covered http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-stokes-vkompella-l2vpn-vpls-oam-01 On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Marlon Duksa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know what control-plane-response in vpls ping cmd mean?

Re: [j-nsp] J-web installation-j6300 router

request system software delete jweb request system software add /var/tmp/blahblah system services web-management http On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Mohd Arshad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have juniper j6300 router i want to install j web graphic interface on it previsly it was installed on it

Re: [j-nsp] Supporting Audit Requirements in JUNOS

engineering deny-commands ^commit.*!comment.*$ but the damn * is being greedy and matching everything... so, I just need to play around with it a bit. On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Christian Koch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Stefan - I have been going through multiple SAS70's

Re: [j-nsp] Supporting Audit Requirements in JUNOS

Hello Stefan - I have been going through multiple SAS70's for the past year now... however, we have a change management process, which changes need to go through in order for a change to be allowed. so everything is all documented.. submit change request - review - approve - push change -

Re: [j-nsp] Enforcing CLI Idle-Timeouts

i tried this a while back and came across the same issue, i've yet to be able to find a 'hack' since.. christian On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Stefan Fouant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Folks, Wondering if anyone knows how to enforce CLI Idle-Timeouts on Juniper using default login

Re: [j-nsp] RD usage in BGP based VPLS

if you're using bgp signaling for auto discovery then you need RD, if you are using LDP, you do not if you still dont know why you need an RD when using bgp, i suggest you read the following RFC's http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4761 http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4762 On Tue, Jun 17,

Re: [j-nsp] /31 subnet mask

/31 is useless/unuseable /31 = 255.255.255.254 - 2 addresses network address and broadcas, there is no room for host addresses On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 8:49 AM, sunnyday [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello can any one explain the use of a /31 subnet mask i know its for saving ip addresses etc etc