Re: [j-nsp] Advertising inactive routes to iBGP neighbors

ib-groups with EVPN routes), bgp add-path >> (doesn't advertise the second path), and playing with route preferences >> (static route needs to be the active route for forwarding purposes), but none >> of those have been successful. >> >> Any other suggestions on how I could

Re: [j-nsp] Advertising inactive routes to iBGP neighbors

--- Begin Message --- Hi Nathan, The only reason I'm using EVPN-VXLAN is for ESI LAG multihoming to the server. In this particular setup, the spines do not do any VXLAN encap/decap and act only as BGP RR's for the leaf switches. The static /32 route is necessary to allocate IP address(es) to the

Re: [j-nsp] Advertising inactive routes to iBGP neighbors

> > On 18/04/2022, at 3:49 AM, James via juniper-nsp > wrote: > > > From: James mailto:ja...@nexril.net>> > Subject: Advertising inactive routes to iBGP neighbors > Date: 18 April 2022 at 3:49:44 AM NZST > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] Advertising inactive routes to iBGP neighbors

sful. > > Any other suggestions on how I could achieve this? > > Thanks, > James > > > > ---------- Forwarded message -- > From: James via juniper-nsp > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2022 10:49:44 -0500 > Subjec

[j-nsp] Advertising inactive routes to iBGP neighbors

--- Begin Message --- Hi all, I have two routes in inet.0, neither of which come from BGP: 10.200.7.2/32 *[Static/5] 00:14:40 > to 10.200.7.2 via irb.102 [EVPN/7] 00:08:25 > via irb.102 I want to advertise the 'EVPN/7' route,