Re: [j-nsp] Juniper BGP invalid attributes

2009-03-18 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 08:46:06PM -0700, Andy Vance wrote: Richard, Appears these are the releases that it has been fixed in. 8-1-4p0-4, 8-2-4p0-7, 9-0-2p0-1, 9-1-2p0-1, 9-2-1p0-1, 9-3-0p0-1, 10-0-0 Now that things have calmed down, I've got a few more updates on this incident and some

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper BGP invalid attributes

2009-03-18 Thread Barry Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 1) Routers shouldn't be leaking confederation information into AS4_PATH. This is the issue that Juniper covers under PSN-2009-01-200, and all code built after 2009-01-26 appears to be fixed in this regard. This is the same issue that was

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper BGP invalid attributes

2009-03-18 Thread Bryan Socha
Does anyone know what Junos revisions for the M series will fix this? We ended up just filtering out the offending announcement but would prefer to update and avoid future ones. Richard's list looks like all E series releases. Bryan Socha ___

[j-nsp] Juniper BGP invalid attributes

2009-03-17 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
Who else just noticed Juniper bgp sessions all over the place flapping with: code 3 (Update Message Error) subcode 1 (invalid attribute list) code 3 (Update Message Error) subcode 11 (AS path attribute problem) Received BAD update for family inet-unicast(1), prefix 193.5.68.0/23 etc? --