Den 01.02.2012 08:26, skrev sth...@nethelp.no:
Yup.. our hindsight would have been to continue deploying
E/ERX ;)
While we don't use those, I certainly agree that they sound
like a much better option from Juniper than the MX.
The Juniper ERX/E-series has its own series of challenges. They have
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 12:32:26 AM James Jones wrote:
I am just curious what issues you guys are having with
the junos releases?
Run through the archives to get a feel for what issues folk
are facing. And these are just the issues that folk have
decided to share.
There are others that
...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 3:05 AM
To: James Jones
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Recommended Releases now posted for MX, M, T, QFX
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 12:32:26 AM James Jones wrote
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 06:12:02 PM Paul Stewart wrote:
One incredible frustration we're going through lately on
the MX boxes is the BRAS function as Mark mentioned
briefly . we're up to bleeding edge code now
(11.4R1.14) just to get what we consider typical
features of a BRAS box.
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 06:26:44 PM Mark Tinka wrote:
The MX is nowhere near ready to run as BRAS. But like
you, we decided to migrate to it, so we have no choice
but to run bleeding edge Junos 11.4R1 as well, just to
get basic things the outgoing Redback is able to do, as
well as some
now posted for MX, M, T, QFX -
Update!
On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 06:26:44 PM Mark Tinka wrote:
The MX is nowhere near ready to run as BRAS. But like you, we decided
to migrate to it, so we have no choice but to run bleeding edge Junos
11.4R1 as well, just to get basic things the outgoing
Just noticed this today - Seems JNPR has filled out the recommended release
JunOS matrix for all the products now (incl M, T, MX, QFX)
http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=contentid=KB21476
- Chris.
... Riding the 10.4 MX Release Train. Next Stop, R9.
Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Kawchuk
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 3:54 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] Recommended Releases now posted for MX, M, T, QFX
Just noticed this today - Seems JNPR
/
From: Paul Stewart p...@paulstewart.org
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 5:12 AM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Recommended Releases now posted for MX, M, T, QFX
Hey Chris yeah, that just showed up about 2 weeks ago (at least that's
that only took...about 5 years ? sweet, juniperdude.
Chris Kawchuk [juniperd...@gmail.com] wrote:
Just noticed this today - Seems JNPR has filled out the recommended release
JunOS matrix for all the products now (incl M, T, MX, QFX)
10 matches
Mail list logo
