Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 Failover Test Issue

2011-03-26 Thread Walaa Abdel razzak
el Lee; juniper-nsp Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 Failover Test Issue 2011/3/23 Chen Jiang It's a by design behavior. When control link or fabric link disconnected, the current RG0 master node will remain in master status but the current RG0 backup node will disable itself to avoid

Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 Failover Test Issue

2011-03-23 Thread Pavel Lunin
2011/3/23 Chen Jiang > It's a by design behavior. When control link or fabric link disconnected, > the current RG0 master node will remain in master status but the current > RG0 backup node will disable itself to avoid split-brain issue, "Disable" > means the node will offline all SPC/NPC and Li

Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 Failover Test Issue

2011-03-23 Thread Doug Hanks
: Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 Failover Test Issue Hi Michael It already configured in a group. Also I was trying to telnet from directly connected ip. groups { node0 { system { host-name FW1; } interfaces { fxp0 { unit 0

Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 Failover Test Issue

2011-03-23 Thread Chen Jiang
} >} >} > } > apply-groups "${node}"; > > BR, > > > -Original Message- > From: Michael Lee [mailto:fwis...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 3:45 AM > To: Pavel Lunin > Cc: Walaa Abdel razzak; juniper-nsp > Subj

Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 Failover Test Issue

2011-03-23 Thread Walaa Abdel razzak
Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 Failover Test Issue Sounds like the interface did not put into group, and should use fxp0 ip instead Regards -mike On Mar 22, 2011, at 12:05, Pavel Lunin wrote: >> >> While testing the failover in SRX650 cluster. I have removed the >> control link between th

Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 Failover Test Issue

2011-03-22 Thread Michael Lee
Sounds like the interface did not put into group, and should use fxp0 ip instead Regards -mike On Mar 22, 2011, at 12:05, Pavel Lunin wrote: >> >> While testing the failover in SRX650 cluster. I have removed the control >> link between the primary and secondary. The secondary node went to >>

Re: [j-nsp] SRX650 Failover Test Issue

2011-03-22 Thread Pavel Lunin
> > While testing the failover in SRX650 cluster. I have removed the control > link between the primary and secondary. The secondary node went to > ineligible mode. The secondry FW is still accessible through OoB > interface. When I returned back the control link I couldn't reach the FW > through O

[j-nsp] SRX650 Failover Test Issue

2011-03-22 Thread Walaa Abdel razzak
Hi Experts While testing the failover in SRX650 cluster. I have removed the control link between the primary and secondary. The secondary node went to ineligible mode. The secondry FW is still accessible through OoB interface. When I returned back the control link I couldn't reach the FW throug