Hi Felipe,
last friday had a power failure, and after getting power back
we had a non-working M7i box. Chassis alarms doesn't even light on.
Looking at console port there was FreeBSD boot saying
something about error
32 lba 0 and error 16 lba 0,
which took me to understand the disk (ad1, the
Hi!
Is that possible to have MTU=1500B on any kind of pseudowire
configured over GRE tunnel between 2 J-series routers?
The tunnel is established over the internet, with access links'
MTU=1500B on both sides. I tried with CCC, l2circuit, l2vpn and various
settings of fragmentation, but I can't
Hi All, I was going through some commands and cos related statistics for in
shell more. I can see most of the time IFL is associated with cos related
statistics...Is there any documentation which explains the relation with IFD
and IFL and how they are used to interact?
Thanks
It looks like, first your primary device failed and then there was a
disconnect of your Control link
You should configure control-link recovery
set chassis cluster control-link-recovery
for re-enabling the disabled device automatically
regards,
Muhammad Fahad Khan
JNCIP - M/T # 834
IT
I don't believe the SSG does SYN proxy'ing, correct?
It does indeed support that. Check in the screen options for SYN flood limit,
as well as enable SYN-Cookie under flow options.
- Chris.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Shiva Shankar writes:
Hi All, I was going through some commands and cos related statistics for in
shell more. I can see most of the time IFL is associated with cos related
statistics...Is there any documentation which explains the relation with IFD
and IFL and how they are used to interact?
We
We try to avoid the terms ifd and ifl completely in our docs,
but these internal terms have slipped out in a few places. The
relationship is fairly simple: ifd is the physical interface
device, where ifl is the logical interface (aka unit). Logical
interfaces are arranged as children of a
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 08:57:20PM +0200, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
We try to avoid the terms ifd and ifl completely in our docs,
but these internal terms have slipped out in a few places. The
relationship is fairly simple: ifd is the physical interface
device, where ifl is the logical
Richard A Steenbergen writes:
But speaking of feature requests related to viewing stuff in the pfe,
I'd love to get something to run a single command on a remote shell and
then exit (i.e. invoke cprod -c rather than vty). Similar to how Cisco
gives you remote login (i.e. start shell pfe) and
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 04:34:41PM -0400, Phil Shafer wrote:
request pfe execute aka request-pfe-execute. I think it
first appeared in 9.x, but it may have been 8.x.
Hrm cool, learn something new every day. :) It'd be nice if there was a
request pfe shell as well, as an alias to what start
Hi there..
During a peer migration from a Cisco 7600 over to Juniper MX480 we have run
across a particular peer that we cannot re-establish:
Jun 9 13:17:07 core1.toronto1 rpd[1301]: bgp_process_open:2625: NOTIFICATION
sent to xxx.xxx.115.132 (External AS x): code 2 (Open Message Error)
Hello,
i am just experiencing and strange problem in regards to a
RE-3.0/RE-600. Its working fine in a T320 but not in a M5/M10 (normal
FEB). Its part number (from show chassis hardware on the T320) is
740-007603 REV 1.
It appears there are several RE-3.0 with different part numbers, this
one
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 08:06:56AM +0800, Tony Frank wrote:
Hi Paul,
During a peer migration from a Cisco 7600 over to Juniper MX480 we have run
across a particular peer that we cannot re-establish:
Jun 9 13:17:07 core1.toronto1 rpd[1301]: bgp_process_open:2625: NOTIFICATION
sent to
13 matches
Mail list logo
