Re: [j-nsp] SRX performance

2015-12-22 Thread harbor235
Great information, thanks for all the input. Mike On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Payam Chychi wrote: > Hi Mike, > > Here is what i got so far, from the testing i had done in the past using > the SRX240H, no issues with 800Mbps and 90K pps... also, no issues with 300 >

[j-nsp] bootp and dhcp-relay

2015-12-22 Thread Antoine
Hi, I'm wondering if anyone can advise me on my issue getting dhcp-relay to work. Currently I am using bootp which is working fine: [edit interfaces xe-1/0/0 unit 186] description To-DHCP-Server; vlan-id 186; family inet { address 172.16.3.45/28; } [edit forwarding-options] helpers {

Re: [j-nsp] NETCONF in Junos

2015-12-22 Thread Stepan Kucherenko
Sometimes it does strange stuff with SSH internally though. Example: Let's say I do " show route table ?" at a router. Logs show: mgd[62935]: UI_CHILD_START: Starting child '/bin/sh' mgd[68498]: UI_AUTH_EVENT: Authenticated user 'root' at permission level 'super-user' mgd[68498]:

[j-nsp] understand "version" and "ns"(namespace) statements in SLAX scripts

2015-12-22 Thread Martin T
Hi, if I look the SLAX script examples in Juniper web-site, then almost all of those examples have "version" and multiple "ns" statements. For example: version 1.0; ns junos = "http://xml.juniper.net/junos/*/junos;; ns xnm = "http://xml.juniper.net/xnm/1.1/xnm;; ns jcs =

Re: [j-nsp] SRX performance

2015-12-22 Thread Stepan Kucherenko
Can anyone share real world SRX performance? ?I am looking at the SRX220 or SRX240 for a small website ~150-200Mbps in a co-location environment. The performance charts state the SRX220 can do 300Mbps with a mix of traffic and up to 900Mbps with mostly large packet sizes. SRX240 can give

Re: [j-nsp] SRX performance

2015-12-22 Thread Payam Chychi
Hi Mike, Here is what i got so far, from the testing i had done in the past using the SRX240H, no issues with 800Mbps and 90K pps... also, no issues with 300 Mbps and 150K pps. I am Not running it in Packet mode since i have no need to do so. I am not doing nay IDS/Anti-Virus/IPSEC. As of