Re: [j-nsp] [c-nsp] LACP between router VMs (James Bensley)

> Chris Burton > Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2017 11:50 PM > > This has been discussed a few times on this list and other forums. That being > said, if you are looking to do this with Linux bridge you will need to modify > the net/br_private.h header library to remove the mask restriction placed

[j-nsp] Juniper equivalent to Cisco NCS5/55 and ASR9001

Hey there, I’m looking to get a basic handle on the Juniper equivalent to some Cisco kit that’s out there. For a NCS5001 comparison, the use case is a simple ISIS, LDP BGP-Free P Core LSR. QFX5110 seem to be closest. Fair? For a NCS5501-SE comparison, the use case would be for a peering

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper equivalent to Cisco NCS5/55 and ASR9001

Jason, For the ASR9001, the MX104 is better than the MX80. I'd look at the MX204 for a bit more future proofing - 8x 10G ports and 4x 100G, looks like break out cables are an option for adding lower speed interfaces. -- Stephen On 2017-11-12 10:08 AM, Jason Lixfeld wrote: Hey there, I’m

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper equivalent to Cisco NCS5/55 and ASR9001

I would be looking at the QFX10K or the QFX52xx series. Chat with your account team for the latest. Jared Mauch > On Nov 12, 2017, at 10:14 AM, Stephen Fulton wrote: > > Jason, > > For the ASR9001, the MX104 is better than the MX80. I'd look at the MX204 > for a